Google search boss says AI isn’t killing search clicks
Technology
49
Beiträge
41
Kommentatoren
118
Aufrufe
-
People still use Google for search?
DuckDuckGo is way better.
-
I don't believe this for half a second.
I believed it for a couple seconds, but then I came to my senses.
-
Do people still use the most popular search engine for search? I get you're trying to be factitious but it comes across as naff.
It might be the most popular but it is utter crap and has been for a while. It has reached peak enshittification. You used to be able to say you absolutely wanted a term in the search or you didn’t want other terms. It ignores all of that now. Google stopped being about able to search years ago and is more about showing you the most relevant ad. I’m either DuckDuckGo or I self-host my own searxng. I’ve also tried using a locally hosted perplexica (running on my own local LLM) which uses searxng underneath the hood I think.
Btw: I’m a yank so I had to look up naff so I learned some cool new slang! Now I’ll admit I was being slightly flippant but serious in the fact that Google really sucks as a search engine now.
-
Do people still use the most popular search engine for search? I get you're trying to be factitious but it comes across as naff.
*facetious
-
I believe it, chiefly because I read the slop answer and then have to check 5 more pages to figure out if it's spouting nonsense or not.
I click the links to the source on the relevant part.
-
Search engines are so significantly worse than they were a decade ago. The golden age of accurate searches is over, now it’s all SEO piss and AI slop.
SEO garbage has been around for much more than a decade. In fact, before Google got really good at search ranking, sites easily gamed the search engines.
-
DuckDuckGo is way better.
Maybe I just am using it wrong, but DDG consistently gives me completely irrelevant results, while Google still gives me what I'm looking for about 70% of the time. Maybe I just need to learn the proper way to search with DDG but so far it's been next to useless in finding me relevant info.
-
Maybe I just am using it wrong, but DDG consistently gives me completely irrelevant results, while Google still gives me what I'm looking for about 70% of the time. Maybe I just need to learn the proper way to search with DDG but so far it's been next to useless in finding me relevant info.
DDG also seems to exclude some websites from search even if you specifically give terms that should give results for a site. Try searching for any model from Bad Dragon's website like "bad dragon nova" or another sex toy maker "mr hankeys beefcake" and the first result should be for the item on the maker's website. I can't ever get DDG to give results and safe search is already off. It has been like this for years.
-
DDG also seems to exclude some websites from search even if you specifically give terms that should give results for a site. Try searching for any model from Bad Dragon's website like "bad dragon nova" or another sex toy maker "mr hankeys beefcake" and the first result should be for the item on the maker's website. I can't ever get DDG to give results and safe search is already off. It has been like this for years.
Duckduckgo uses Bing which has deindexed a couple of sites.
I have found the emulation wiki to no longer show up through DDG. It's the first result on Google but DDG gives you just Fandom garbage.
-
To give credit to the people trying to make good search, the internet is so much worse than it was a decade or two ago.
Over that time the ad driven internet has encouraged low quality, high volume websites full of articles designed around common search terms.
It started before AI, but now you can drum up an article in seconds it has got much worse.
Yup I ran into this last week, looking for a wiring diagram of a relatively obscure part.
1st page of results on DDG and Google were both AI ‘blog’ style results of random diagrams unrelated to the part. All the same “loading…” text and I’m pretty sure all generated on the fly as I opened them.
It didn’t even give me the manufacturer’s site in the first 2 pages. And because I got upset and clicked through every result to vent to a co-worker, it decided to give me MORE slop results. I watched the useful info vanish from the results on reloads of the same search term.
-
Yup I ran into this last week, looking for a wiring diagram of a relatively obscure part.
1st page of results on DDG and Google were both AI ‘blog’ style results of random diagrams unrelated to the part. All the same “loading…” text and I’m pretty sure all generated on the fly as I opened them.
It didn’t even give me the manufacturer’s site in the first 2 pages. And because I got upset and clicked through every result to vent to a co-worker, it decided to give me MORE slop results. I watched the useful info vanish from the results on reloads of the same search term.
Holy crap, I hadn't considered that we have the technology to create articles on the fly based on search terms.
That could be a serious weapon of war - you get your site to the top through SEO, then show each user personalised propoganda. You show googlebot the genuine page but adjust the page based on what you know about the user.
