Skip to content

YouTube rolls out more unskippable ads that make viewers wait even longer to watch videos - Dexerto

Technology
231 166 6.5k
  • 473 Stimmen
    50 Beiträge
    74 Aufrufe
    J
    No, they don't say they will sue (they flat out can't), but they say they will cut off your access to any updates. Now one could (and I would) argue that sounds like a restriction on exercising your open source rights. However the counter argument seems to be those protections apply only to software acquired to date, and if you deny access to future binaries you can deny access to those sources. In any event, all this subtlety around the licensing aside, it's just a bigger hassle to use RedHat versus pretty much any other distribution, precisely because they kind of want IBM/Oracle style entitlement management where the user gets to have to do all the management work to look after their suppliers business needs.
  • 54 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.worldM
    Fuck Israel, genocidal scum!
  • Like clockwork, Peacock is raising subscription prices again

    Technology technology
    55
    1
    328 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    951 Aufrufe
    maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM
    And a 24TB drive goes for 350, I don't see prices going up either
  • escorte paris

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 71 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    76 Aufrufe
    adespoton@lemmy.caA
    Most major content producers have agreements with YouTube such that as their content is discovered, monetization all goes to the rights holders. In general, this seems like a pretty good idea, and better than copyright maximalism. However, I’ve had original works of my own “monetized by rights holder” because they used my work (with permission) in one of their products, and so now have co-opted all expressions of my work on YouTube. So the system isn’t perfect.
  • Canadian telecom hacked by suspected China state group

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    57 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    M
    While this news is both expected and unsettling, I'm pretty keen on how our gov has this info available to the public. And the site itself - such a vast resource for security info, tools, etc. Not all of our gov nor all departments are something to behold, but our cyber teams are top notch. And holy shit: https://github.com/CybercentreCanada
  • 74 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    105 Aufrufe
    C
    Time to start chopping down flock cameras.
  • 44 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    G
    It varies based on local legislation, so in some places paying ransoms is banned but it's by no means universal. It's totally valid to be against paying ransoms wherever possible, but it's not entirely black and white in some situations. For example, what if a hospital gets ransomed? Say they serve an area not served by other facilities, and if they can't get back online quickly people will die? Sounds dramatic, but critical public services get ransomed all the time and there are undeniable real world consequences. Recovery from ransomware can cost significantly more than a ransom payment if you're not prepared. It can also take months to years to recover, especially if you're simultaneously fighting to evict a persistent (annoyed, unpaid) threat actor from your environment. For the record I don't think ransoms should be paid in most scenarios, but I do think there is some nuance to consider here.