Skip to content

Adblockers stop publishers serving ads to (or even seeing) 1bn web users - Press Gazette

Technology
347 204 491
  • Radio geeks say you can still get 'lost' DoD hurricane data

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    178 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    jimerson@lemmy.worldJ
    Fun fact! I'm studying for my amateur radio technician license and learned that ham came from calling amateur telegraph operators' sloppy work 'ham-fisted'. The amateur radio community decided to lean into it, and thus the ham radio operator was born
  • 21 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The Prime Reasons to Avoid Amazon

    Technology technology
    88
    1
    397 Stimmen
    88 Beiträge
    667 Aufrufe
    X
    Yeah, not a choice any of us who work in tech can make. But the small choices we CAN make do add up significantly.
  • The End of Publishing as We Know It

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    50 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB
    Lol.. I wanted "DRM". But it's been a long day.
  • 66 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    M
    FYI- insurance company data breaches impact more than just customers. I had my identity stolen a few years ago because a small car insurance company I've never heard of was able to buy data on me from my state's government to build a potential customer profile, and then they got hacked. I would assume Aflac has data on just about everyone in the US.
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    207 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 27 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    F
    Small progress is still progress. Kick management in the dick, friends.
  • 5 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    B
    Oh sorry, my mind must have been a bit foggy when I read that. We agree 100%