Skip to content

Adblockers stop publishers serving ads to (or even seeing) 1bn web users - Press Gazette

Technology
350 205 1.1k
  • When A Face Scan Decides Who Eats And Who Keeps Their Job

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    24 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    R
    Someone heard about IBM providing punch card machines for Auschwitz and thought that was insufficiently banal.
  • 75 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    87 Aufrufe
    realitista@lemmy.worldR
    But fascist really fails to capture the ethnic cleansing part. We really do need a new group name to discuss the Israelis who commit ethnic cleansing. Someday I hope we will use it to round up these fuckers for their trials in The Hague. I guess we should call them Likuds or just Zionists.
  • Dubai to debut restaurant operated by an AI chef

    Technology technology
    6
    26 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    G
    Huh, looks like my days of having absolutely zero interest in going to Dubai are coming to a middle
  • 32 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    J
    Oddly enough i heard that in my head with trump's voice. What has been heard cannot be unheard!
  • 229 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    280 Aufrufe
    D
    Oh it's Towers of Hanoi. I have a screensaver that does this.
  • The largest cryptocurrency money-laundering ring

    Technology technology
    26
    326 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    137 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    It has their name and where it came from so. Yes? That's not what I asked. Are you expecting people to direct link everything even when it is already atributed? I mean is that really too much to expect of people? To simply copy the link where they found the information and post it along with where they shared it?
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    420 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet