Skip to content

Why Denmark is dumping Microsoft Office and Windows for LibreOffice and Linux

Technology
78 57 355
  • It's rude to show AI output to people

    Technology technology
    53
    1
    453 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    540 Aufrufe
    F
    I gave advice, advice rarely follows what you've experienced or people wouldn't feel the need to give it.
  • 738 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    645 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • 803 Stimmen
    385 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    F
    Thank you for your suggestion. I didn't think of building a cabin. Our land is collective and we can't just build a house casually. That's why we have to save money to build a house. Thank you always, I hope we can all have a bright future~
  • Exclusive: OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

    Technology technology
    28
    54 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    202 Aufrufe
    T
    Also Servo is now under the Linux Foundation. Both this and Ladybird are very exciting.
  • 324 Stimmen
    40 Beiträge
    166 Aufrufe
    P
    Jimmy Carter gave up his tiny peanut farm. Yet people nowadays are just incapable of understanding the concept of conflict of interest?
  • lemm.ee is shutting down at the end of this month

    Technology technology
    130
    625 Stimmen
    130 Beiträge
    636 Aufrufe
    vopyr@lemmy.worldV
    If I know correctly, it is not possible to export posts, comments, replies.
  • 5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    O
    I feel like I'm in those years of You really want a 3d TV, right? Right? 3D is what you've been waiting for, right? all over again, but with a different technology. It will be VR's turn again next. I admit I'm really rooting for affordable, real-world, daily-use AR though.