Skip to content

Why Denmark is dumping Microsoft Office and Windows for LibreOffice and Linux

Technology
77 56 3
  • 25 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    I didn't care much about arc because it was chromium, but damn this is just bland and uninteresting compared to it
  • A ban on state AI laws could smash Big Tech’s legal guardrails

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    121 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    P
    It's always been "states rights" to enrich rulers at the expense of everyone else.
  • Welcome to the web we lost

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    181 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    C
    Is it though? Its always far easier to be loud and obnoxious than do something constructive, even with the internet and LLMs, in fact those things are amplifiers which if anything make the attention imbalance even more drastic and unrepresentative of actual human behaviour. In the time it takes me to write this comment some troll can write a dozen hateful ones, or a bot can write a thousand. Doesn't mean humans are shitty in a 1000/1 ratio, just means shitty people can now be a thousand times louder.
  • 149 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    C
    Got it, at that point (extremely high voltage) you'd need suppression at the panel. Which I would hope people have inline, but not expect like an LVD.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.
  • Backblaze Drive Stats for Q1 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    49 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 88 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    C
    Won't someone think of the shareholders?!
  • 121 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    D
    I bet every company has at least one employee with right-wing political views. Choosing a product based on some random quotes by employees is stupid.