Skip to content

Mastercard deflects blame for NSFW games being taken down, but Valve says payment processors 'specifically cited' a Mastercard rule about damaging the brand

Technology
137 92 39
  • WhatsApp deletes over 6.8m accounts linked to scams, Meta says

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    82 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    ?
    There is no justification. The "Ends" in E2EE mean the initial sender, and intended recipient. The "transport" should have zero insight into the content. Encrypting a message to the servers is standard even for "non-private" messaging services, it's usually done with SSL (part of HTTPS). Lets compare it to traditional mail. If you send something, the postal company can always just open your mail and read it. With computers, we have black magic (E2EE) that physically prevents the postal company from doing that. In this hypothetical, Facebook (owner of WhatsApp) is the company that provides you with the pen and paper (the app), and is a postal company (their servers). They promise that the black magic on the paper prevents them from reading what you wrote, but then they clearly read the content of your letter to send you a summary of the conversation. Mid-message quick edit: They could've also done something to the pen (other parts of the app) to have it tell them what you wrote. This would mean the black magic (E2EE) is applied, but is completely useless. (End of edit) If the process for making the pen and paper (the app) was publicly known (open source), you could make your own, and be sure the black magic (E2EE) is applied properly. That way you can be certain the postal company (servers) can't read your letter, only the recipient can. If the postal company gives you the pen and paper without telling you how to make it, it's nearly impossible to tell if the black magic was applied properly.
  • Elon Musk opens Tesla Restaurant in Los Angeles

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 114 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    S
    I admire your positivity. I do not share it though, because from what I have seen, because even if there are open weights, the one with the biggest datacenter will in the future hold the most intelligent and performance model. Very similar to how even if storage space is very cheap today, large companies are holding all the data anyway. AI will go the same way, and thus the megacorps will and in some extent already are owning not only our data, but our thoughts and the ability to modify them. I mean, sponsored prompt injection is just the first thought modifying thing, imagine Google search sponsored hits, but instead it's a hyperconvincing AI response that subtly nudges you to a certain brand or way of thinking. Absolutely terrifies me, especially with all the research Meta has done on how to manipulate people's mood and behaviour through which social media posts they are presented with
  • life trip

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 634 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    D
    theyll only stop selling politicians and block that
  • 6 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    61 Aufrufe
    blue_berry@lemmy.worldB
    Cool. Well, the feedback until now was rather lukewarm. But that's fine, I'm now going more in a P2P-direction. It would be cool to have a way for everybody to participate in the training of big AI models in case HuggingFace enshittifies
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orgE
    Nextdoor is an absolute black hole social media site, it absorbs the worst of humanity so we don't have to see them anywhere else.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet