Skip to content

How the US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state

Technology
66 45 243
  • I want to know!

    Technology technology
    6
    4 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.comR
    !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev !ergomechkeyboards@lemmy.world !splitmechkeyboards@lemmy.world and maybe !keychron@lemmy.ca These would be much more appropriate for your post. Also, have a proper post title and question when you post there.
  • NVIDIA is full of shit

    Technology technology
    135
    1
    396 Stimmen
    135 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    F
    DLSS is applied in the rendering pipeline before post processing effects. It is part of the rendering pipeline. You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. We’re done here.
  • 43 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    S
    So they're doing good work at least.
  • 41 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    M
    Does anybody know of a resource that's compiled known to be affected system or motherboard models using this specific BMC? Eclypsium said the line of vulnerable AMI MegaRAC devices uses an interface known as Redfish. Server makers known to use these products include AMD, Ampere Computing, ASRock, ARM, Fujitsu, Gigabyte, Huawei, Nvidia, Supermicro, and Qualcomm. Some, but not all, of these vendors have released patches for their wares.
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    236 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Ads on YouTube

    Technology technology
    47
    30 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    217 Aufrufe
    K
    this is like a soulless manager or some ai bot trying to figure why the human brain hates terrible interruptions
  • 10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 68 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH
    Worked with the US federal government for much of my professional career, mostly in an adversarial role. "reliable federal data sources" do not exist