Spotify fans threaten to return to piracy as music streamer introduces new face-scanning age checks in the UK
Technology
419
Beiträge
250
Kommentatoren
7
Aufrufe
-
Don't threaten, just do it!
I don't get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.
I don't use any proprietary apps. Only FOSS apps installed on my phone.
-
I don't use any proprietary apps. Only FOSS apps installed on my phone.
Hope you're enjoying the freedom, fellow FOSSer
-
Hope you're enjoying the freedom, fellow FOSSer
Sometimes I feel like it's just too simple. Then I see articles like this and I'm like nope. Staying away from that bullshit.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I switched to Qobuz about two weeks ago. I've been really impressed.
-
It's a load of bullshit, for a start the ISP has my details and should be able to attest my connection is rented by someone of legal age and it should be up to me what I let my children (assuming I have any) see and not see on that connection. I already had to click the "yes just give me the porn damn it" agreement on my mobile phone which was less likely to be randomly shared unmonitored and now this overbearing crap. I'll just avoid sites and services that require this.
I’ll just avoid sites and services that require this.
It's not the site wanting to do it. It's a requirement from Parliament in the UK.
The Online Safety Act 2023[1][2][3] (c. 50) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online content. It was passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power to designate, suppress, and record a wide range of online content that is deemed "illegal" or "harmful to children".[4][5]
The Act creates a new duty of care for online platforms, requiring them to take action against illegal content, or legal content that could be "harmful" to children where children are likely to access it. Platforms failing this duty would be liable to fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whichever is higher. It also empowers Ofcom to block access to particular websites. It obliges large social media platforms not to remove, and to preserve access to, journalistic or "democratically important" content such as user comments on political parties and issues.
I mean, you don't have to go there if you want, but it's probably Parliament you want to be irritated with, not websites following British laws.
-
I switched to Qobuz about two weeks ago. I've been really impressed.
Is this FOSS? Is it on GitHub or can I get it from another app store like F-Droid?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Back in the day, Grooveshark was the king before all these subscription guys showed up.
-
Don't threaten, just do it!
I don't get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.
-
There are fans of Spotify?
It's their silly little way of saying conned subscription holders.
-
Don't threaten, just do it!
I don't get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.
Personally, the open source community's aversion to algorithms is what's holding me back. Say what you will about them, but I've found many great songs thanks to Spotify's algo.
-
This post did not contain any content.
No account or subscription required.
Hundreds of internet radio stations. Some are ad-supported, some are ad-free but you can contribute to the station's patreon.
-
Don't threaten, just do it!
I don't get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.
people like having their stuff.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Already did this ages ago. Been building a collection for decades now. I'm pushing about 10k albums on the NAS. Haven't had spotify since like 2018
-
people like having their stuff.
Well... with streaming services people don't actually have anything, because nothing in there is theirs to own
-
Personally, the open source community's aversion to algorithms is what's holding me back. Say what you will about them, but I've found many great songs thanks to Spotify's algo.
Soulseeks recommendation algorithm is top notch, almost organic. You click the 'browse users files' button.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I have never in my entire life paid for a streaming service. I didn't stop pirating when Netflix was the only game in town and cost $8 / month. I didn't pay for streaming even when every normie started getting internet access and "everyone was doing it". Even during the high point of my life where I was not only gainfully employed but also able to accumulate savings I STILL never had a streaming service. You could count the self hosting spotify clone I made as a "streaming service" but I'm not paying extra money or probably supporting people with different ideological beliefs than me in order to use it so that really doesn't count.
-
This post did not contain any content.
just buy releases from bands on Bandcamp
-
Personally, the open source community's aversion to algorithms is what's holding me back. Say what you will about them, but I've found many great songs thanks to Spotify's algo.
If you're just looking for an engine that recommends you music based off your likes, the FOSS community could utilize the Music Genomoe Project to build a tool too do that based one a folder or Playlist of music provided to it. I would be surprised if there already wasn't a FOSS tool to do that.
-
Well... with streaming services people don't actually have anything, because nothing in there is theirs to own
sure. though it would be easier to talk someone into jumping off a bridge than to convince them to give up something they mostly hate but enjoy one crucial feature of
-
I'd prefer my internet free...
Like other medias before, internet probably has reached a need for some harder control. I'm not talking about porn, I'm talking about disinformation, bots and soon AI.
Not sure which is the best way but I'll not give any id or credit card to any randim site in order to see their content.
