Trump extends the TikTok ban deadline for a third time; there is no legal basis for the extensions and it is unclear how many times the deadline can be extended
-
I mean, sort of, yes, but also no? It's another tool of power for a tyrannical government to wield, even if it is against companies I dislike.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 01:08 zuletzt editiert vonIs it tyrannical to make companies obey laws they don't agree with? I mean it's probably tyrannical for the law to exist in the first place but this feels like a "well well well if it isn't the consequences of my own actions" for these companies propping up establishment candidates who line up be cucked by Israel.
-
The far right is using TikTok to reach young demographics. Banning it directly contradicts his interests.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 02:05 zuletzt editiert vonYeah, all of the “vibes are off” jokes aside, TikTok is drastically different after the ban was lifted. I have gotten straight up racist and fascist propaganda on my fyp, and there are a lot of sympathetic comments on those videos. But I never got those videos before, because my algorithm was automatically filtering them out. It’s almost as if the app has been programmed to bypass the algorithm and occasionally show alt-right talking points to everyone, just in the hopes of casting as wide a net as possible.
-
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:01 zuletzt editiert von
By that logic, you'd think trump would be a slave.
He IS a 34x convicted criminal after all.
-
By that logic, you'd think trump would be a slave.
He IS a 34x convicted criminal after all.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:27 zuletzt editiert vonBy that logic
Whoa, keep your thinking to our dear leader
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:37 zuletzt editiert von
Y'all, I just got my replacement tooth, so I'm finally off my mechanical diet, and I've been waiting months to eat some hard shell TACOS! Some SPICY CHICKEN TACOS!
-
Haven't judges been knocking down a bunch of his proclamations? It's not bulletproof, and it hasn't been everything, but clearly some things are a bridge too far. At least for now.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:43 zuletzt editiert vonAnd he and bis goons ignore the judges
-
Lol what a gimp
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:38 zuletzt editiert von -
Yeah, all of the “vibes are off” jokes aside, TikTok is drastically different after the ban was lifted. I have gotten straight up racist and fascist propaganda on my fyp, and there are a lot of sympathetic comments on those videos. But I never got those videos before, because my algorithm was automatically filtering them out. It’s almost as if the app has been programmed to bypass the algorithm and occasionally show alt-right talking points to everyone, just in the hopes of casting as wide a net as possible.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 09:15 zuletzt editiert vonI’ve had that experience on all social media platforms. Sometimes just straight up hard right propaganda will appear on my feed and I have to block it again and again.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 10:38 zuletzt editiert von
Going for a half win because that’s all he can do
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 10:41 zuletzt editiert von
a.k.a. how to own a social media platform without having to buy it.
Art of the deal.
-
The legal basis is someone with standing would have to sue him over it. Tiktokm certainly isn't going to and Congress... Well.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 11:55 zuletzt editiert vonMaybe Elmo could, now that they broke up. He could argue that TikTok existing makes Twitter's videos less popular.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 12:10 zuletzt editiert von
Could have just said chickened out again

-
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 12:15 zuletzt editiert von
Which is why they lable anyone they arrest as a criminal, doesn't have to be true. You heard Trump, having a trial for each one would take too long. So just slap a label on them and say you're though on crime.
-
Maybe Elmo could, now that they broke up. He could argue that TikTok existing makes Twitter's videos less popular.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 13:39 zuletzt editiert von roguetrick@lemmy.worldHard to have standing over a third party not doing something to someone else that would hurt them to maybe(key point here) help you. It's possible to argue yourself there but the bar is incredibly high. If you can't assign direct provable causation and redress, you're SOL.
It's kind of like how nobody really could challenge DACA in the courts from the Republican side because all the harms they cited were hypothetical.
-
How is he being blackmailed by TWO superpowers? China and Russia both have his balls.
What a loser.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 13:50 zuletzt editiert von -
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 16:07 zuletzt editiert von
That’s rich coming from a defender of the IDF.
-
That’s rich coming from a defender of the IDF.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 00:54 zuletzt editiert vonI'm not sure who you're referencing to, but I'm assuming you're not referring to me, because I despise the IDF
-
Cory Doctorow at CF 25: How Enshittification Conquered the 21st Century and How We Can Overthrow It
Technology vor etwa einem Tag
1
-
Why a Court Order to Block Internet Archive's Open Library Was Put On Hold
Technology42 vor 3 Tagenvor 3 Tagen
1
-
-
UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill
Technology42 vor 15 Tagenvor 22 Tagen
1
-
OpenAI signs deal with United Kingdom to find government uses for its models
Technology42 vor 28 Tagenvor 29 Tagen
1
-
-
-
Some of your AI prompts could cause 50 times more CO2 emissions than others
Technology 19. Juni 2025, 12:56
1

