Is it tyrannical to make companies obey laws they don't agree with? I mean it's probably tyrannical for the law to exist in the first place but this feels like a "well well well if it isn't the consequences of my own actions" for these companies propping up establishment candidates who line up be cucked by Israel.

Yeah, all of the “vibes are off” jokes aside, TikTok is drastically different after the ban was lifted. I have gotten straight up racist and fascist propaganda on my fyp, and there are a lot of sympathetic comments on those videos. But I never got those videos before, because my algorithm was automatically filtering them out. It’s almost as if the app has been programmed to bypass the algorithm and occasionally show alt-right talking points to everyone, just in the hopes of casting as wide a net as possible.

By that logic, you'd think trump would be a slave.

He IS a 34x convicted criminal after all.

By that logic

Whoa, keep your thinking to our dear leader

Y'all, I just got my replacement tooth, so I'm finally off my mechanical diet, and I've been waiting months to eat some hard shell TACOS! Some SPICY CHICKEN TACOS!

And he and bis goons ignore the judges

I’ve had that experience on all social media platforms. Sometimes just straight up hard right propaganda will appear on my feed and I have to block it again and again.

Going for a half win because that’s all he can do

Maybe Elmo could, now that they broke up. He could argue that TikTok existing makes Twitter's videos less popular.

Could have just said chickened out again

Which is why they lable anyone they arrest as a criminal, doesn't have to be true. You heard Trump, having a trial for each one would take too long. So just slap a label on them and say you're though on crime.

Hard to have standing over a third party not doing something to someone else that would hurt them to maybe(key point here) help you. It's possible to argue yourself there but the bar is incredibly high. If you can't assign direct provable causation and redress, you're SOL.

It's kind of like how nobody really could challenge DACA in the courts from the Republican side because all the harms they cited were hypothetical.

That’s rich coming from a defender of the IDF.

I'm not sure who you're referencing to, but I'm assuming you're not referring to me, because I despise the IDF