Skip to content

Half of companies planning to replace customer service with AI are reversing course

Technology
179 102 259
  • 75 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 15 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    P
    WTF I looked for something like this for a while and this never popped up. Awesome.
  • Matrix is cooked

    Technology technology
    29
    1
    153 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    jadedblueeyes@programming.devJ
    The Matrix Foundation and Element/New Vector are different orgs, and it's Element with the government contracts
  • AJWIN — A Revolução do Entretenimento Online em Suas Mãos

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Apple acquires RAC7, its first-ever video game studio

    Technology technology
    16
    1
    67 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    E
    I'm not questioning whether or not the game is good, just wondering why Apple would want to limit their customer base so much.
  • 61 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    merde@sh.itjust.worksM
    is the linked article or the title edited? This was a post about VA GPT
  • 50 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    A
    it's an insecurity.
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    242 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/