Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
252 163 0
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • tonytins@pawb.socialT

    DeepSeek accused of powering China’s military and mining US user data

    Technology technology
    21
    1
    136 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    bogasse@lemmy.mlB
    A quotes from my networking teacher, a few years back : WikiLeaks revelations on NSA are great news to us, now we can by cheap Chinese hardware as we know it won't spy on us any more than american hardware.
  • P

    Doctors are using unapproved AI software to record patient meetings, investigation reveals

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    161 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    real_squids@sopuli.xyzR
    Why are you using quotations marks? On a serious note, Google's bloat isn't inherent to android, their stuff is added on top as apps and services.
  • D

    How can websites verify unique (IRL) identities?

    Technology technology
    6
    8 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    Safe, yeah. Private, no. If you want to verify whether a user is a real person, you need very personally identifiable information. That’s not ever going to be private. The best you could do, in theory, is have a government service that takes that PII and gives the user a signed cryptographic certificate they can use to verify their identity. Most people would either lose their private key or have it stolen, so even that system would have problems. The closest to reality you could do right now is use Apple’s FaceID, and that’s anything but private. Pretty safe though. It’s super illegal and quite hard to steal someone’s face.
  • P

    Salt Lake City, plans to implement AI-assisted 911 call triaging to handle ~30% of about 450K non-emergency calls per year

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • S

    Super Human In Transit - Living

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • C

    Interactive McCabe-Thiele Diagram Calculator for Binary Distillation - ChemEnggCalc

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • A

    Louisiana Becomes First State to Adopt DOGE Voter Maintenance Database

    Technology technology
    7
    68 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH
    Worked with the US federal government for much of my professional career, mostly in an adversarial role. "reliable federal data sources" do not exist
  • P

    The European Commission says it is investigating Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos for potential child safety Digital Services Act (DSA) violations “as a matter of priority”

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    93 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?