Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
298 182 3.8k
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • S

    Easily Install Longhorn on Kubernetes

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • R

    RUCKUS Networks

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • D

    BBC gains rare access to the Congolese mine powering mobile phones

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    128 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    98 Aufrufe
    R
    In propaganda, the main thing is not to confuse militants with insurgents.
  • M

    Why do AI company logos look like buttholes?

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    36 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI
    It's a nascent industry standard called The Artificial Intelligence Network Template, or TAINT.
  • P

    Social media can support or undermine democracy — it comes down to how it’s designed: Platform design is a silent pilot steering human behavior.

    Technology technology
    5
    70 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    62 Aufrufe
    rimu@piefed.socialR
    Yep It is a design choice to offer a news feed that combines verified news sources with tankie memes — interspersed with photos generated by AI I've really tried to provide tools to tame the meme flood and put them into effect on https://PieFed.social - compare that with the front-page (or All feed) of any Lemmy instance (or most PieFed instances, to be fair). Gen AI filter is coming.
  • tonytins@pawb.socialT

    Senate GOP budget bill has little-noticed provision that could hurt your Wi-Fi

    Technology technology
    72
    1
    349 Stimmen
    72 Beiträge
    899 Aufrufe
    M
    Sure, the internet is more practical, and the odds of being caught in the time required to execute a decent strike plan, even one as vague as: "we're going to Amerika and we're going to hit 50 high profile targets on July 4th, one in every state" (Dear NSA analyst, this is entirely hypothetical) so your agents spread to the field and start assessing from the ground the highest impact targets attainable with their resources, extensive back and forth from the field to central command daily for 90 days of prep, but it's being carried out on 270 different active social media channels as innocuous looking photo exchanges with 540 pre-arranged algorithms hiding the messages in the noise of the image bits. Chances of security agencies picking this up from the communication itself? About 100x less than them noticing 50 teams of activists deployed to 50 states at roughly the same time, even if they never communicate anything. HF (more often called shortwave) is well suited for the numbers game. A deep cover agent lying in wait, potentially for years. Only "tell" is their odd habit of listening to the radio most nights. All they're waiting for is a binary message: if you hear the sequence 3 17 22 you are to make contact for further instructions. That message may come at any time, or may not come for a decade. These days, you would make your contact for further instructions via internet, and sure, it would be more practical to hide the "make contact" signal in the internet too, but shortwave is a longstanding tech with known operating parameters.
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldG

    Have LLMs Finally Mastered Geolocation? - bellingcat

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    50 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    R
    Depends on who programed the AI - and no, it is not Kyoto
  • P

    Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe

    Technology technology
    94
    1
    461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.