Skip to content

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
298 182 3.6k
  • Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment

    Technology technology
    46
    1
    24 Stimmen
    46 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    T
    elon is using the fresh aquifer drinking water of the memphis sands aquifer to cool grok. he promised to build a wastewater plant for cooling but he hasn’t. shocked-pikachu.gif he’s also powering it off of lng turbine generators that are flooding south memphis with air pollution. please do not use grok.
  • datacenter liquid cooling solution

    Technology technology
    35
    34 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    218 Aufrufe
    S
    A legit exception might occur with a strict energy-optimization objective, where the point would be transporting heat outside of an HVAC envelope as efficiently as possible. The cost of the additional thermal load is often ignored by hobbyists in their energy calculations but it can be significant. In the context of fixed-capacity solar, for example, it might be cheaper to pipe waste heat from a telco closet to a space that isn’t climate controlled, like a garage, than it would be to expand the solar installation for increased HVAC draw.
  • 1k Stimmen
    180 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    M
    I expect i will crumple at that point. But i hope i set him up with the tools he needs to navigate that part of life. And hopefully he feels close enough with me to come to me for help.
  • 136 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    94 Aufrufe
    N
    I support them , china I mean
  • My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    13 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    318 Aufrufe
    J
    I did read it, and my comment is exactly referencing the attitude of the author which is "It's good enough, so you should use it". I disagree, and say it's another dumbass shortcut to cash grab on a less than stellar ecosystem and product. It's training wheels for failure.
  • 105 Stimmen
    173 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    smartmanapps@programming.devS
    the proper way is to group it as 1+(-2)+3 No it isn't. you can do it in any order You can do it in any order anyway left to right 1-2+3=-1+3=2 addition first 1+3-2=4-2=2 subtraction first -2+1+3=-1+3=2 right to left 3-2+1=1+1=2 What I meant with ““rule”” is the meme questions pray on people not understanding/remembering what the actual rules are And you showed that you were one of them. Every answer you got other than 4 was wrong, because you didn't understand the rules. spoiler alert: doing it in different orders never means add brackets to it. Addition first for 10-1+1 is 10+1-1, not 10-(1+1). See previous textbook example why “left to right” conventions exist They exist because people like you make mistakes when you try to do it in a different order. Either learn how the rules work or stop spreading disinformation. Well, you should stop spreading disinformation regardless.
  • 17 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The technology to end traffic deaths exists. Why aren’t we using it?

    Technology technology
    36
    43 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    365 Aufrufe
    M
    You’re seriously attempting to argue with me about whether or not transportation existed before cars?