Skip to content

Former GM Executive: BYD cars are good in terms of design, features, price, quality. If we let BYD into the U.S. market, it could end up destroying american manufacturers

Technology
369 186 4
  • Alibaba Cloud claims new DB manager beats rival hyperscalers

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    7 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Financial 'stretch' for UK to join Europe's Starlink rival

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    29 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • How to transform your Neovim to Cursor in minutes - Composio

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • ChatGPT Lost a Chess Game to an Atari 2600

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    25
    1
    225 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    100 Aufrufe
    baduhai@sopuli.xyzB
    Communicate securely with WhatsApp? That's an oxymoron.
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    125 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • Science and Technology News and Commentary: Aardvark Daily

    Technology technology
    2
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    I
    What are you on about with this? Last news post 2013?
  • 136 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    64 Aufrufe
    E
    I thought we were going to get our share of the damages