Skip to content

Former GM Executive: BYD cars are good in terms of design, features, price, quality. If we let BYD into the U.S. market, it could end up destroying american manufacturers

Technology
274 150 1
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The Wikipedia Test

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    85 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    B
    You act like they want us to have access to information they don't have full control over. I'm pretty sure that's a really low priority for most of them.
  • How Cops Can Get Your Private Online Data

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    107 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    M
    Private and online doesn't mix. Except if it's encrypted.
  • How can websites verify unique (IRL) identities?

    Technology technology
    6
    8 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    H
    Safe, yeah. Private, no. If you want to verify whether a user is a real person, you need very personally identifiable information. That’s not ever going to be private. The best you could do, in theory, is have a government service that takes that PII and gives the user a signed cryptographic certificate they can use to verify their identity. Most people would either lose their private key or have it stolen, so even that system would have problems. The closest to reality you could do right now is use Apple’s FaceID, and that’s anything but private. Pretty safe though. It’s super illegal and quite hard to steal someone’s face.
  • Honda successfully launched and landed its own reusable rocket

    Technology technology
    170
    1
    1k Stimmen
    170 Beiträge
    426 Aufrufe
    gerryflap@feddit.nlG
    Call me an optimist, but I still hold the hope that we can one day do better as humanity than we do now. Humanity has become a "better" species throughout its existence overall. Even a hundred years ago we were much more horrible and brutal than we are now. The current trend is not great, with climate change and far-right grifters taking control. But I hold hope that in the end this is but a blip on the radar. Horrible for us now, but in the grand scheme of things not something that will end humanity. It might in the worst case set us back a few hundred years.
  • 257 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    L
    Maybe you're right: is there verification? Neither content policy (youtube or tiktok) clearly lays out rules on those words. I only find unverified claims: some write it started at YouTube, others claim TikTok. They claim YouTube demonetizes & TikTok shadowbans. They generally agree content restrictions by these platforms led to the propagation of circumspect shit like unalive & SA. TikTok policy outlines their moderation methods, which include removal and ineligibility to the for you feed. Given their policy on self-harm & automated removal of potential violations, their policy is to effectively & recklessly censor such language. Generally, censorship is suppression of expression. Censorship doesn't exclusively mean content removal, though they're doing that, too. (Digression: revisionism & whitewashing are forms of censorship.) Regardless of how they censor or induce self-censorship, they're chilling inoffensive language pointlessly. While as private entities they are free to moderate as they please, it's unnecessary & the effect is an obnoxious affront on self-expression that's contorting language for the sake of avoiding idiotic restrictions.
  • YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

    Technology technology
    96
    1
    215 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    300 Aufrufe
    C
    "Not Interested" is just free data for them to fill out your account's advertising profile.
  • 168 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    A
    Law enforcement officer