I don't think they're sensationalist, they just don't sugarcoat the industry bullshit. And believe it or not, they need to make money from this, it doesn't pay itself. It's like saying newspapers should be free, or else informing the people isn't their primary concern.

"A farmer wants the money. Giving the good away for free would be great if they just wanted to feed people, but that's not their primary concern." Can even play that game for nurses etc

they just don't sugarcoat

To the contrary, they massively inflate whatever they can find that will gather clicks.

without context? context is in the video. or do you want titles that span 4 lines with 3 sentences?

It's clickbait.

its fine if its first and foremost a backup, and not a public platform. then you don't need the bandwidth. then they can open it up when google deleted their channel. they still need to figure out the capacity issues, but at least the content was not lost.

its fine if its first and foremost a backup, and not a public platform. then you don't need the bandwidth. then they can open it up when google deleted their channel. they still need to figure out the capacity issues, but at least the content was not lost.

As someone who worked for years in video transcoding, archiving, streaming, and content management in general: there are absolutely ways to do this efficiently in a self hosted context. You could absolutely build a system that fits your bespoke needs in all of these categories.

there is revenue stream. liberapay is integrated, get your viewers to subscribe through there. they can donate any amount, literally.

then its also common that content creators cooperate with companies, mostly tech companies, to advertise their products. that can still be done on peertube. what they can't anymore is to show generic ads for everyone every few minutes.

I don't have an "anchor point" other than what's what's fair and respectful of your customers. "We're going to collect as much data about you as we can to sell to advertisers" is neither.

While The title of the video is absolutely one of sensationalism, It's not out of the question as two more strikes could indeed delete a channel...

Examples?

Source of attention? By flying to another country and getting access to areas people never even knew? Lol wtf are you on about?

No, just be honest. "Bloomberg fradulent copyright strike on our black market documentary".

Still one sentence.

I use a Firefox extension called Dearrow because of this understandable, but unfortunate trend.

Waaaay less money to be made there. Not saying he's exclusively doing this for the money like the other reply, but we're not talking about some solo guy making videos in his free time for fun. The man is running a business, needs money to make this videos happen, and to my knowledge this is his job.

I don’t watch his channel

You could have stopped your comment right there, because what followed was nothing of value.

Nah. He’d be better off on floatplane. I wonder why he isn’t…

In a rising tide of enshittification we all have to find higher, cleaner ground. Standing on a hill that seems to be above the shit for awhile is an ok strategy even if that hill is owned by someone else and might sink into the shit eventually. It’s working for now and it’s better than being in the shit. Not everyone can build their own hill, at least not right away.

$$$ that's why. YouTube gives the greatest return. If they post to multiple platforms, not only is it more work, but they then also subtract from the number of views they get on YouTube. It's all about the $$$.

In their documentary GamersNexus stated that they would air it without advertisements if a certain treshold of funding was reached. I imagine Patreon, their store and other sources make GamersNexus more money than Youtube advertisement. And it is certainly not their only source.

Lemmy simps really hard for gamers nexus, even though they're just a drama channel at this point.