Apple announces iOS 26 with Liquid Glass redesign
Technology
68
Beiträge
43
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
How would you prefer they handle it?
Just to look at macOS version history,
The first public release was "Mac OS X 10.0", this continued until "Mac OS X 10.7 Lion". The "big cat" became part of the marketing name because the OS & version were a mouthful and throwing numbers around wasn't helpful.
We drop the "Mac" next year, then switch to mountains, but it's not long before we reach, "OS X 10.10" aka "OS ten ten ten".
Well it wasn't long before we simplified further and just said "macOS", but then took a while before we dropped the "10". Now we just get "macOS 15 Sequoia".
For nearly 18 years the Mac operating system had an unnecessary "10" that conveyed zero information.
Major version numbers are used when stuff changes, and especially when shit breaks. Can the latest OS X 10 run the same software and on the same hardware as the first OS X 10? If not, increase the major number.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What the hell are they thinking
-
This post did not contain any content.
Guess this means Apple has run out of ideas on how to make iPhone better.
What can we do to distract attention away from the fact that we don't have any decent new features?
- "Rename the business unit so we can print new letterheads and business cards?" Our customer don't work here, sir. "Dammit!"
- "Release a new color that nobody wants? How about a light blue that is so close to the regular silver no one can tell?" We did that last year, sir. "Dammit!"
- "Oh, I know: Repeat the year 2000 mistake by naming our OS versions after the current year using only 2 digits. That will never bite us in the ass in the future." Brilliant, sir.
-
What the hell are they thinking
Trick question: null
-
This post did not contain any content.
Honestly, it looks kind of terrible to me. Not to mention how unreadable text is since there's apparently no guaranteed contrast with black text due to the transparent backgrounds. I feel like I'm going crazy with all the random articles praising it.
-
Did they? MD2 and MD3 look very different from Apple's design languages
Google themselves don't really follow material all that closely over their entire product line.
Android 6 was basically the peak of the UI, IMO, the icons were very consistent and nice early material.
In later versions they shrank the icons and stuffed them into circles and started using a horrible color scheme, then they killed blobmoji and started outright copying Apple's hideous emojis with that awful gradient and pseudo-skeumorphic visuals.
-
i mean yes, but this is a more dynamic transperency that reacts more to backgrounds, merging/separating with other elements, etc.
I mean... look, I'm genuinely not trying to be a sour asshole, but why did we need this? How is this furthering the development of smartphone tech? It's, like... sure, pretty graphics are nice, but do we really need ray-tracing on our phones? (I know it's not ray-tracing, but you get my point)
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hey, it's aqua! We've come full circle!
-
This post did not contain any content.
These guys spend a billion dollars every couple years to invent the lock screen again
-
This post did not contain any content.
I never understood products that use the next year as their version nr. Why isn't this iOS25?
-
I never understood products that use the next year as their version nr. Why isn't this iOS25?
I presume because due to it releasing in September, it’s lifetime will mostly lie in 2026. But honestly Idk, I am godawful at naming things.
-
Gives me iOS 7 vibes.
I like it in theory, but in some of the examples they provided on https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/apple-introduces-a-delightful-and-elegant-new-software-design/, reading text isn't the easiest with all the colors and blurs everywhere.
Wow, that is bad.
The music one is probably the worst of the examples. The artist name is barely readable most of that clip.The notifications are rough too, a big wall of white text against a burry multicolor background is not fun to read.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It has more blur than average Hyprland rice
-
This post did not contain any content.
I actually really like this…
-
This post did not contain any content.
Liquid Ass
-
I mean... look, I'm genuinely not trying to be a sour asshole, but why did we need this? How is this furthering the development of smartphone tech? It's, like... sure, pretty graphics are nice, but do we really need ray-tracing on our phones? (I know it's not ray-tracing, but you get my point)
It's what happens when they run out of useful things to improve but still need to announce something to make people think they're getting an upgrade.
-
I actually really like this…
yeah i don't remember the last time i liked something Apple made (probably over a decade by now) but this actually looks great.
-
I beg to differ. It’s not a „putting up with“. I don’t hate modern flat designs but if I was putting up with anything it’s that.
Loved the translucent look back then, still love it now. Am very looking forward to the design update. Especially since the new design is not just some standard windows aero like transparency but actually has glass like refractions.
I’m very glad we’re getting something with a little more depth again, without going full 180 to the clutter of peak skeumorphic iOS <7.
I’m a little bit concerned about readability of text on the translucent backgrounds but on the other hand, it feels unlikely that Apple didn’t think of that…
Edit: typo
Yep. I was really annoyed when Windows moved away from the aero effects of Vista and 7 to the flat look of 8/8.1, 10, and 11.
(Yes yes, Windows bad. I have to use it for work.)
I’m looking forward to this, I think it looks gorgeous.
-
This post did not contain any content.
jfc. that is one ugly looking ui. really scraping bottom of the barrel. that is soo last years.
