Skip to content

Proton’s Lumo AI chatbot: not end-to-end encrypted, not open source

Technology
126 58 3
  • Former Moderator Sues Chaturbate for 'Psychological Trauma'

    Technology technology
    24
    1
    120 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    150 Aufrufe
    S
    We all have those days. No offense taken. Cheers!
  • 172 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    133 Aufrufe
    K
    Guys hi, just looking for some support share, a Fantasy Adventure Story, for all ages and just some entertain with some storyes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mVIvQ1wsgg - maybe you are curious
  • Are a few people ruining the internet for the rest of us?

    Technology technology
    25
    1
    236 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    454 Aufrufe
    H
    [image: ec1c05b8-0650-4b4b-b52a-dd9eb7ed9d02.png]
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    H
    Just to add — this survey is for literally anyone who's been through the project phase in college. We’re trying to figure out: What stops students from building cool stuff? What actually helps students finish a project? How mentors/teachers can support better? And whether buying/selling projects is something people genuinely do — and why. Super grateful to anyone who fills it. And if you’ve had an experience (good or bad) with your project — feel free to share it here too
  • 363 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    A
    No I don't think there really were many so your point is valid But the law works like that, things are in a grey area or in limbo until they are defined into law. That means the new law can be written to either protect consumer privacy, or make it legal to the letter to rape consumer privacy like this bill, or some weird inbetween where some shady stuff is still explicitly allowed but in general consumers are protected in specific ways from specific privacy abuses This bill being the second option is bad because typically when laws are written it then takes a loooong time to reverse them
  • Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    5k Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • 195 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    336 Aufrufe
    isveryloud@lemmy.caI
    It's a loaded term that should be replaced with a more nimble definition. A dog whistle is the name for a loaded term that is used to tag a specific target with a large baggage of information, but in a way where only people who are part of the "in group" can understand the baggage of the word, hence "dog whistle", only heard by dogs. In the case of the word "degeneracy", it's a vague word that has been often used to attack, among other things, LGBTQ and their allies as well as non-religious people. The term is vague enough that the user can easily weasel their way out of criticism for its usage, but the target audience gets the message loud and clear: "[target] should be attacked for being [thing]." Another example of such a word would be "woke".
  • Short summary of feature phone market in 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet