Skip to content

Proton’s Lumo AI chatbot: not end-to-end encrypted, not open source

Technology
126 58 3
  • Why does technology create new problems for each one it solves?

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    60 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    R
    Not really, there's an OR logical element present in our world. Divide et impera, applied to engineering. For 80% of things this fast cool solution works, for 20% the simpler one works. The aggregating element to make using both in their own situations transparent reduces reliability just a bit, but the efficiency gain is visible. And the "80%" and "20%" solutions can further on too use such unifying elements to aggregate different solutions for them. To improve efficiency without additional failure points (except for aggregators). Nobody does that because the "80% solution" producer wants to capture you, they don't want alternatives, they want power, and it's a honeypot. It's up to you the customer to understand this. In the classical model. Also see customer associations, which are like unions inverted. Isn't it funny how we have big businesses organizing, but not labor and not customers? While for them it's much more important. As you can see, the aggregator is very important here. We need standards, so that all social media would compete with other social media in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all search engines would compete with other search engines in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all file hostings ... you get the idea.
  • 4 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    K
    You made this site, you say? What an odd coincidence! Were you inspired by the site you say you "stumbled upon" here? https://lemmy.world/post/33395761 Because it sure seems like the exact same site.
  • Junior dev's code worked in tests, deleted data in prod

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    91 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    S
    The second one is a testament to why you should always run it as a SELECT statement first to verify you typed it correctly.
  • DIY experimental Redox Flow Battery kit

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    37 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    C
    The roadmap defines 3 milestone batteries. The first is released, it's a benchtop device that you can relatively easily build on your own. It has an electrode side of 2 x 2cm2. It does not store any significant amount of energy. The second one is being developed right now, it has a cell the size of a small 3d printer bed (20x20cm) and will also not store practical amounts of energy. It will hopefully prove though that they are on the right track and that they can scale it up. The third battery only will store significant amounts of energy but in only due end of the year (probably later). Current Vanadium systems cost approx. 300-600$/kWh according to some random website I found. The goal of this project is to spread the knowledge about Redox Flow Batteries and in the medium term only make them commercially viable. The aniolyth and catholyth are based on the Zink-Iodine system in an aqueous solution. There are a bunch of other systems though, each with their trade offs. The anode and cathode are both graphite felt in the case of the dev kit.
  • Seven Goldfish

    Technology technology
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 31 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Why Silicon Valley Needs Immigration

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    36 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    "Because theyŕe greedy fucks". There, saved you a click.
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    K
    I wish the batteries were modular/interchangeable. You could just pull into a station, remove the spent battery and replace it with a full one, the spent one can then just get recharged and stored at the station for the next user to change out. You could even bring some extra ones in the trunk for a long trip!