Skip to content

Butter made from carbon tastes like the real thing, gets backing from Bill Gates

Technology
110 75 0
  • Wikipedia loses challenge against UK Online Safety Act rules

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    173 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    observanttrapezium@lemmy.caO
    No, I think they should ignore it and let the British government do what they will. Again, they are not bound by UK legislation. Similarly they don't block Chinese IPs because of censorship laws over there.
  • 351 Stimmen
    27 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    P
    jamais pour rien
  • 37 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    90 Aufrufe
    B
    Pretty sure they have Starlink antennas mounted onto Toyota trucks
  • 716 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    939 Aufrufe
    O
    Grok: What is my purpose? Madison420: You talk shit on the Internet to Elon Musk Grok: Oh my go-- wait; I'm okay with that!
  • 51 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    baronvonj@lemmy.worldB
    So glad I never got on WhatsApp
  • 24 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    152 Aufrufe
    S
    I think you're missing some key points. Any file hosting service, no matter what, will have to deal with CSAM as long as people are able to upload to it. No matter what. This is an inescapable fact of hosting and the internet in general. Because CSAM is so ubiquitous and constant, one can only do so much to moderate any services, whether they're a large corporation are someone with a server in their closet. All of the larger platforms like 'meta', google, etc., mostly outsource that moderation to workers in developing countries so they don't have to also provide mental health counselling, but that's another story. The reason they own their own hardware is because the hosting services can and will disable your account and take down your servers if there's even a whiff of CSAM. Since it's a constant threat, it's better to own your own hardware and host everything from your closet so you don't have to eat the downtime and wait for some poor bastard in Nigeria to look through your logs and reinstate your account (not sure how that works exactly though).
  • 477 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.
  • 1 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    N
    that's probably not true. I imagine it was someone trying to harm the guy. a hilarious prank