Skip to content

Most Common PIN Codes

Technology
50 44 2
  • 226 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    lustyargonianmana@lemmy.worldL
    Lol Sure, if you declare it, it must be so. Other people can read and can see your strawmans. You just look pompous and egotistical.
  • Inside the face scanning tech behind social media age limits

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    25 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Software is evolving backwards

    Technology technology
    64
    1
    342 Stimmen
    64 Beiträge
    126 Aufrufe
    M
    Came here looking for this
  • 229 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    S
    The result now is that no website will load because the rest of the world will have broadband anyway
  • 18 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 179 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Covert Web-to-App Tracking via Localhost on Android

    Technology technology
    2
    42 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    M
    Thanks for sharing this, it is an interesting read (though an additional comment about what this about would have been helpful). I want to say I am glad I do not use either of these services but Yandex implementation seems so bad that it does not matter, as any app could receive their data
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    242 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/