Skip to content

Switzerland plans surveillance worse than US

Technology
90 60 620
  • Can I build a fully decentralised website?

    Technology technology
    14
    15 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.comS
    Microsoft Flight Simulator,... duh /s
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • OpenAI Announces Massive US Government Partnership

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    103 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    M
    If its a repeating pattern is there ever a winner or a loser? Except for us, of course, who always lose.
  • 109 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.worldA
    I'm not talking about the openly bigoted chuds out there I'm talking about the regular rank and file Americans who decided there was no room to question the the horrors we expanded from the shadows and filled every corner of our media with. Formerly kindly everyday american morons didn't just watch it, they cheered. They scolded they youth for thinking we were entitled to the bill of rights. It was fucking bizarre who swallowed the bait.
  • Hughes.net?

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    6 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    252 Aufrufe
    bombomom@lemmy.worldB
    If you are within visual sight of the mainland, you can use a pair of point-to-point communication dishes to get internet from the mainland and beam it to yourself. These dishes, only having to communicate over a few miles and with direct line-of-sight, are pretty reliable and not terribly expensive.
  • You should block Censys from scanning your network

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    20 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    S
    I mean, you can, or you can use it to assure your firewall is configured correctly. The entire Internet is scanning you at all times, why would you focus your attention on one of the services who is willing to share their results with you? Believe me, you probably have lower hanging fruit to pick.
  • 216 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    127 Aufrufe
    J
    It’s DEI’s fault!
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    387 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.