Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it again

This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it again

Technology
28 26 0
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • O

    How to Train Your Own ChatGPT: A Step-by-Step Resource Guide to Custom GPTs

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    12 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    P
    This has nothing to do with training a GPT or model. It’s a point form guide to using the Custom GPT feature in the ChatGPT app. It’s really mostly just “write a prompt and upload pdfs”
  • U

    NoName057(16): Russia’s Digital Spoiler Force in Ukraine and Beyond

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    18 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    R
    highly likely, damn
  • P

    How LLMs could be insider threats

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    106 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    124 Aufrufe
    patatahooligan@lemmy.worldP
    Of course they're not "three laws safe". They're black boxes that spit out text. We don't have enough understanding and control over how they work to force them to comply with the three laws of robotics, and the LLMs themselves do not have the reasoning capability or the consistency to enforce them even if we prompt them to.
  • D

    “Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent shouted loudly at Elon Musk in the halls of the West Wing last month

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    78 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    U
    Obligatory Knowledge Fight Reference: [https://knowledgefight.libsyn.com/1044-june-2-2025](In this installment, Dan and Jordan discuss a strange day on Alex's show where he spends a fair amount of time trying to dissuade his listeners from getting too suspicious about Palantir.)
  • A

    Pimax: one more brand exposed for promoting "positive reviews".

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    55 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    moose@moose.bestM
    This doesn't really surprise me, I've gotten weird vibes from Pimax for years. Not so much to do with their hardware, but how their sales / promo team operates. A while back at my old workplace we randomly got contacted by Pimax trying to have us carry their headset, which was weird since we didn't sell VR stuff or computers even, just other electronics. It was a very out of place request which we basically said we wouldn't consider it until we can verify the quality of the headset, after which they never replied.
  • A

    Community organizations in Milwaukee call for oversight of police surveillance

    Technology technology
    1
    35 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • P

    The European Commission says it is investigating Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos for potential child safety Digital Services Act (DSA) violations “as a matter of priority”

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    382 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • M

    Pocket shutting down

    Technology technology
    2
    2 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    B
    Can anyone recommend a good alternative? I still use it to bookmark most wanted sites.