Skip to content

The End Of The Hackintosh Is Upon Us

Technology
30 22 0
  • Ready-made stem cell therapies for pets could be coming

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    26 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 528 Stimmen
    123 Beiträge
    359 Aufrufe
    B
    I'm not saying to waste space... but when manufacturers start a pissing match among themselves and say that it's because it's what the customers want, we end up with shit. Why does anyone need a screen that curves around the edge of the phone? What purpose does this serve? Who actually asked for this? I would give up some of my screen area to have forward facing speakers. I want a thicker phone that has better battery life. I also want to be able to swap out my battery. Oh, and I don't want the entire thing encased in glass. If we're so concerned about phone size then they should stop designing them so that a case is required.
  • 111 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    78 Aufrufe
    O
    Ingesting all the artwork you ever created by obtaining it illegally and feeding it into my plagarism remix machine is theft of your work, because I did not pay for it. Separately, keeping a copy of this work so I can do this repeatedly is also stealing your work. The judge ruled the first was okay but the second was not because the first is "transformative", which sadly means to me that the judge despite best efforts does not understand how a weighted matrix of tokens works and that while they may have some prevention steps in place now, early models showed the tech for what it was as it regurgitated text with only minor differences in word choice here and there. Current models have layers on top to try and prevent this user input, but escaping those safeguards is common, and it's also only masking the fact that the entire model is built off of the theft of other's work.
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Why so much hate toward AI?

    Technology technology
    73
    38 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    179 Aufrufe
    H
    AI has only one problem to solve: salaries
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    218 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 62 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    W
    What could possibly go wrong? Edit: reads like the substrate still needs to be introduced first
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    V
    Here's how you know it's not ready: AI hasn't replaced a single CEO.