Meta plans to replace humans with AI to automate up to 90% of its privacy and integrity risk assessments, including in sensitive areas like violent content
Technology
44
Beiträge
36
Kommentatoren
15
Aufrufe
-
I think AI is positioned to make better decisions than execs. The money saved would be huge!
The money saved goes where?
-
Expecting current gen tool to be as smart as humans? Doesn't mean they're useless. They can translate words to images and explain art in terms of business.
They add capabilities not replace.
They add capabilities not replace.
They poison all repositories of knowledge with their useless slop.
They are plummeting us into a dark age which we are unlikely to survive.
Sure, it's not the LLMs fault specifically, it's the bastards who are selling them as sources of information instead of information-shaped slop, but they're still being used to murder the future in the name of short term profits.
So, no, they're not useless. They're infinitely worse than that.
-
The money saved goes where?
It goes to pay off the debt of all of the nations in the world and will then usher in a new age of peace, obviously.
-
It goes to pay off the debt of all of the nations in the world and will then usher in a new age of peace, obviously.
Haha. That says it all.
-
They add capabilities not replace.
They poison all repositories of knowledge with their useless slop.
They are plummeting us into a dark age which we are unlikely to survive.
Sure, it's not the LLMs fault specifically, it's the bastards who are selling them as sources of information instead of information-shaped slop, but they're still being used to murder the future in the name of short term profits.
So, no, they're not useless. They're infinitely worse than that.
Hear me out, Ollama.
-
Only if the also take the full legal responsibility for the AIs actions.
The business model IS dodging any kind of responsibility so... yeah, I think they'll pass.
-
No, they give you an answer that should sound correct enough to enable them to score a positive interaction.
Why do you think so many GPT answers seem plausible but don't work? Because it has very very little actual logic
very very little actual logic
To be precise, 0.
-
Honestly, I've always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.
Bsky already does that.
-
Honestly, I've always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.
Yup.
It's a traumatic job/task that gets farmed to the cheapest supplier which is extremely unlikely to have suitable safe guards and care for their employees.If I were implementing this, I would use a safer/stricter model with a human backed appeal system.
I would then use some metrics to generate an account reputation (verified ID, interaction with friends network, previous posts/moderation/appeals), and use that to either: auto-approve AI actions with no appeals (low rep); auto-approve AI actions with human appeal (moderate rep); AI actions must be approved by humans (high rep).This way, high reputation accounts can still discuss & raise awareness of potentially moderatable topics as quickly as they happen (think breaking news kinda thing). Moderate reputation accounts can argue their case (in case of false positives). Low reputation accounts don't traumatize the moderators.
-
Hear me out, Ollama.
Hear me out, Eliza. It'll be equally useless and for orders of magnitude less cost. And no one will mistakenly or fraudulently call it AI.
-
-
-
-
-
An analysis of X(Twitter)'s new XChat features shows that X can probably decrypt users' messages, as it holds users' private keys on its servers
Technology
1
-
Germany's Federal Cartel Office warns Amazon that its marketplace retailer price controls likely violate national and EU laws, in its preliminary assessment
Technology
1
-
Meta and Palmer Luckey's Anduril Industries partner to build EagleEye, a new AI-powered weapons system, including rugged helmets, glasses, and other wearables
Technology
1
-
