Skip to content

Ted Cruz's plan to punish states that regulate AI shot down in 99-1 vote

Technology
62 52 0
  • Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    203 Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • Microsoft Tests Removing Its Name From Bing Search Box

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    53 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    alphapuggle@programming.devA
    Worse. Office.com now takes me to m365.cloud.microsoft which as of today now takes me to a fucking Copilot chat window. Ofc no way to disable it because gee why would anyone want to do that?
  • Spyware and state abuse: The case for an EU-wide ban

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    54 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    M
    I'm surprised it isn't already illegal to install software on someone's phone without their consent or knowledge. Sounds like a form of property damage.
  • 78 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    U
    Obligatory Knowledge Fight Reference: [https://knowledgefight.libsyn.com/1044-june-2-2025](In this installment, Dan and Jordan discuss a strange day on Alex's show where he spends a fair amount of time trying to dissuade his listeners from getting too suspicious about Palantir.)
  • 580 Stimmen
    278 Beiträge
    76 Aufrufe
    V
    The main difference being the consequences that might result from the surveillance.
  • 479 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.
  • The technology to end traffic deaths exists. Why aren’t we using it?

    Technology technology
    36
    43 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    M
    You’re seriously attempting to argue with me about whether or not transportation existed before cars?
  • 317 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    F
    By giving us the choice of whether someone else should profit by our data. Same as I don't want someone looking over my shoulder and copying off my test answers.