Skip to content

YouTube just quietly blocked Adblock Plus — the internet hasn't noticed yet, but I've found a workaround

Technology
275 158 101
  • Chinese firm to be banned for stealing Samsung's OLED tech

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    134 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    K
    Patents can't be owned by companies. Only individuals. In the event of any patent being the result of a team effort each person responsible for its development is gets a proportion of profits from it. If person develops a patent while employed at a corporation that company owns a lease on the patent lasting 10 or 20 years or something . I'm sure there's holes in this you can drive a truck through but high level I feel like there is something there. I also can't be arsed to flesh it out further.
  • 464 Stimmen
    107 Beiträge
    156 Aufrufe
    H
    There's no need for the government to prevent people from becoming wealthy. The only ways to become that wealthy all involve monopolies. But every single monopoly that has ever existed, has only managed to become a monopoly due to help from allies in government. AKA Regulatory Capture. When governments are large, and filled with bureaucrats that aren't answerable to the public, monopolies are far more likely to emerge, as those same bureaucrats enact more and more regulations that make entering the market more and more difficult for those of modest to little means.
  • 17 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Z
    That's because it's mostly blah, blah.
  • 61 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    gsus4@mander.xyzG
    At least they're good at imagining all the ways in which you can hurt yourself way beforehand...and making sure you don't do them...or anything else
  • 255 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    190 Aufrufe
    S
    According to the case website, it looks like it's only people who own a device made by Google that runs their voice assistant. So, Samsung Android users are not included, but anyone with a Google Home device or a Chromecast is included
  • 211 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    160 Aufrufe
    A
    When it comes to public outreach, the question is more “why not?”
  • An AI video ad is making a splash. Is it the future of advertising?

    Technology technology
    2
    10 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    apfelwoischoppen@lemmy.worldA
    Gobble that AI slop NPR. Reads like sponsored content.
  • 288 Stimmen
    46 Beiträge
    938 Aufrufe
    G
    Just for the record, even in Italy the winter tires are required for the season (but we can just have chains on board and we are good). Double checking and it doesn’t seem like it? Then again I don’t live in Italy. Here in Sweden you’ll face a fine of ~2000kr (roughly 200€) per tire on your vehicle that is out of spec. https://www.europe-consommateurs.eu/en/travelling-motor-vehicles/motor-vehicles/winter-tyres-in-europe.html Well, I live in Italy and they are required at least in all the northern regions and over a certain altitude in all the others from 15th November to 15th April. Then in some regions these limits are differents as you have seen. So we in Italy already have a law that consider a different situation for the same rule. Granted that you need to write a more complex law, but in the end it is nothing impossible. …and thus it is much simpler to handle these kinds of regulations at a lower level. No need for everyone everywhere to agree, people can have rules that work for them where they live, folks are happier and don’t have to struggle against a system run by bureaucrats so far away they have no idea what reality on the ground is (and they can’t, it’s impossible to account for every scenario centrally). Even on a municipal level certain regulations differ, and that’s completely ok! So it is not that difficult, just write a directive that say: "All the member states should make laws that require winter tires in every place it is deemed necessary". I don't really think that making EU more integrated is impossibile