Skip to content

Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules

Technology
26 21 13
  • How weird is it that the left doesn't make these connections and press it when we see people like Zuckerberg standing with Republicans while Republicans push for the laws.

    Like what is lacking on the left side to make these really great observations but in meaningful ways?

    People on the right seize on these opportunities every time. Within days whatever view they have is shared across multiple countries on multiple sites and influencers. But the left is like a few comments isolated on Lemmy among pictures of Ed Sheeran. We're having fun though. That's what matters.

    The left uses critical thinking. They need to actually engage with information and verify it before choosing to adopt it. This takes time.

    The right are scared children and adopt whatever their TV parent or religious politician tells them out of fear. This takes zero time.

  • More people need to coorinate and work together on the left. That's the missing link

    The right has group chats, and online communities for all kinds of stuff that I'm surprised the left hasn't built much of yet

    Exactly, and it's not like there needs to be a weekly stand up for progressive leftist.

    We just need to be aware we're sleeping at the wheel and that needs to stop. We're passively watching it all not realizing we're supposed to be participating

  • The left uses critical thinking. They need to actually engage with information and verify it before choosing to adopt it. This takes time.

    The right are scared children and adopt whatever their TV parent or religious politician tells them out of fear. This takes zero time.

    I doubt this "critical thinking" statement more and more everyday.

    I think we're exactly the same. Both sides believe they are critical thinkers. Difference is the right for whatever reason has more Victories. If we were actually critical thinkers, we'd figure out why and adapt. Instead, we seem to be losing faster and faster because we are not learning anything. We're just doing the same shit every day and failing.

    Critically thinking involves being critical of ourselves. That's something I think we actually don't do.

  • I doubt this "critical thinking" statement more and more everyday.

    I think we're exactly the same. Both sides believe they are critical thinkers. Difference is the right for whatever reason has more Victories. If we were actually critical thinkers, we'd figure out why and adapt. Instead, we seem to be losing faster and faster because we are not learning anything. We're just doing the same shit every day and failing.

    Critically thinking involves being critical of ourselves. That's something I think we actually don't do.

    No offense, but have you considered that Democrats aren't left?

    Because compared to the rest of the world and political spectrum, they are not "left."

    So you are absolutley correct that:

    we're exactly the same. Both sides believe they are critical thinkers.

    Both the GOP and DEMS have the same corporate blindspots. Both think they're critical thinkers, but will defend their party as the "correct" one rather than admit that the system has completely failed to keep money away from influencing every outcome.

    We have a congress and senate stacked with millionaires doing the bidding of the billionaires that pay for their campaigns instead of the people that vote for them.

    The only difference between the GOP and the DNC, is that the DNC wants a slow decent into a corporate dystopia instead of a fast one that kills people unnecessarily.

    Actual "left" policies requires the following discourse that is impossible for the DNC to have honestly:

    • reducing the military budget
    • reducing corporate welfare
    • workers rights & Union rights
    • increasing taxes on the wealthy

    All of these things have become "too socialist" for a DEM to even bring up, and you'll justify that as them "aiming for moderates" instead of thinking critically about how every facet of our society is now corporate controlled and the reason actual "left" socialist policy isn't talked about is simply because Facebook, Google, and X own the spaces those conversations happen. Instead of actual discourse, and cooperating on collective measures, corporations make sure the algorithms they control make America too afraid and angry of overexagerated BS to not think critically about the failure of their society to move forward in two decades despite the massive wealth concentrating at the top of it.

    DEMS love having a bad guy to point to. So do the GOP. Yet that finger is always pointed at the other party instead of the Billionaires that have used their unspent "Trickle Down" Reagonomic tax breaks to make society worse instead of better, because problems like unaffordable Healthcare are incredibly more profitable than a publically funded one.

    Yet I'll bet you want to blame the GOP for that too. Not Senator Lieberman, an Independent, who got rid of the public option in Obamacare by simply threatening a filibuster that the Dems immediately capitulated to despite already having enough votes without him.

    If you want to think critically, you're going to have to start by not pointing fingers at the GOP when the DEMS consistently capitulate on our most beneficial legislation to favor their coporate donors.

    Actual critical thinking is almost impossible in America, as it requires accepting that the system we live in doesn't work, and insisting on using it the way we're "supposed to" has lead to massive wealth disparity and the loss of freedoms to corporate interests.

    It's certainly not hard to see when the greatest threat to United Health and costly health insurance in the last 15 years has come from an assassin instead of our elected officials. Show me a DEM explaining Luigi Mangionis actions instead of chastising him for it.

  • They'll reverse the decision when those teens start saying "Stop Genocide" on social media.

    100% guaranteed.

    I saved a screenshot of this to post when it happens, if you give your permission

  • A federal judge ruled today that Florida cannot enforce a law that requires social media platforms to block kids from using their platforms. The state law "is likely unconstitutional," US Judge Mark Walker of the Northern District of Florida ruled while granting the tech industry's request for a preliminary injunction...

    Tread on me harder daddy

  • Perhaps it would have been smarter to prevent these predatory behaviors from social networks in the first place. Because it is probably constitutionally more sound to ban some behaviors rather than outright ban social networks altogether.

    Right. This shouldn't be about restricting children; but rather, this should be about restricting corporation's bad behaviors. It's also not just children that are impacted. Mining online dopamine-junkies for data by placing money extractors right on their weak spots is unethical, like selling someone crack, or phone scamming the elderly.

  • The founding fathers intended for kids to use tik tok

    Just imagine if the eloquent words of the founding fathers were the norm of the type of content you see on tik tok. If that were the case, I would have joined a long time ago.

  • More people need to coorinate and work together on the left. That's the missing link

    The right has group chats, and online communities for all kinds of stuff that I'm surprised the left hasn't built much of yet

    I mean, the left has communities, but as soon a s they begin organising .worlders call them tankies.

  • Exactly, and it's not like there needs to be a weekly stand up for progressive leftist.

    We just need to be aware we're sleeping at the wheel and that needs to stop. We're passively watching it all not realizing we're supposed to be participating

    I wish everyone could read your comment right now. Spot on

  • 236 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    B
    the distills are good for their sizes but not even close to being comparable to the full model in quality
  • Brain activity lower when using AI chatbots: MIT research

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    128 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Z
    Depends how much clutch is left ‍
  • 51 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    baronvonj@lemmy.worldB
    So glad I never got on WhatsApp
  • 98 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    K
    This guy wasn't born yesterday.
  • 328 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    M
    Good. Anyone who uses shit like this deserves all of the bad things that go along with it. Stupidity will continue to be punished.
  • 151 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    D
    I played around the launch and didn't realize there were bots (outside of pve)... But I also assumed I was shooting a bunch of kids that barely understood the controls.
  • 5 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    alphane_moon@lemmy.worldA
    I don't drive and have minimal experience with cars. Does it make a big difference whether your Android Automotive solution is based on Android 13 or 15? It's been a long time since I've cared about OS upgrades for Android on smartphones, perhaps the situation is different with Android Automotive?
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    242 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/