Skip to content

Reddit will block the Internet Archive

Technology
156 101 1.6k
  • 522 Stimmen
    66 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    H
    The state exports almost three-fifths of the electricity it produces, according to the EIA. this means to use internal "surplus" electricity in the state, 750mw data center would be supported. The initial build is 1.8gw. Need to increase electricity production in the state by over 150%. Surrounding states that depend on Wyoming imports get screwed if WY production not increased more.
  • 236 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    300 Aufrufe
    K
    AI has some use but it always needs human oversight and the final decision must also be made by a human professional. If you use AI to speed up tasks and you know whether the output of the AI is valid or not, and you have the final decision, then you can safely use it. But if you let AI decide on and execute important tasks basically autonomously, then you have a recipe for disaster. Fully autonomous and mistake-free AI is a naive pipe dream which I don't see on the horizon at all.
  • When A Face Scan Decides Who Eats And Who Keeps Their Job

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    24 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    R
    Someone heard about IBM providing punch card machines for Auschwitz and thought that was insufficiently banal.
  • Microsoft to Lay Off About 9,000 Employees

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    284 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    479 Aufrufe
    D
    Actually you forgot about data mining or Spyware. Windows has literally become Spyware. I would switch faster than light if anticheat didn't gatekeep Linux. Edit: Microsoft products have literally become Spyware
  • 30 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    I
    That is a drive unit. The robot is bending down next to it wearing a vest.
  • 52 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    kolanaki@pawb.socialK
    Same. That's probably why I suck ass at math, but my spatial awareness is off the chart. 🫠
  • 461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • @chrlschn - Beware the Complexity Merchants

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    57 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    78 Aufrufe
    S
    I'm a big fan of the manta "Make your designs as simple as possible and no simpler". Pointless complexity drives me nuts, but others take it too far and remove functionality by making things too minimal. It doesn't help that a lot of businesses optimize for people who make changes, so the positive feedback loop is change for the sake of change rather than improving the product.