I mean, carrier pigeons sd cards or thumb drives being moved by motorbike is actually a reasonable way to move a lot of data, in one chunk, fairly fast, in poor infrastructure environments, given how insanely space dense storage memory is now... but yeah thats not gonna work for lots of little bits of data moving to many places, very fast.

Thats what 4G, 5G, other radio frequencies that work well enough for data transfer are for.

Like, I am posting this from a phone that is WiFi connected to a 5G base station tower, because my building is too shit to even have a working cable line.

120 mbs down, not blazing fast, but more than enough to stream 720p/1080p 60fps video, latency is actually low enough to stand a chance at an online competetive game.

FCC regulations not withstanding... you could concievably just jerry rig this thing to directly talk with other same base stations, instead of or as well as the tower its actually connected to.

If there aren't already people out there somewhere making rough analogues to a 5G internet base station, that can talk to each other as basically dedicated local mesh routers... out of rasberry pi's or something... I'd be shocked.

Fuck, you could blast a HAM or CB radio with 56k dialup protocol, and some kind of extra redundancy/signal noise processor.

Again, laws against this notwithstanding... thats absolutely possible to do.

Ham Radios

ABSOLUTELY HARAM

On the other hand Meshtastic nodes can be solar powered and independent. You can easily build a big-ish mesh with a couple hundred western monetary units.

It also uses common frequencies with every single wireless weather display and garage door opener and wireless outlet.

Also HAM operators are required to not encrypt their traffic and are licensed/registered, thus easily found and their equipment taken away.

Neither is perfect tho

deleted by creator

But Elon shut off Starlink to Ukraine at the worst time… he can do it to you too.

Aren’t most cell tower functions just backhauled to the Internet these days, anyway?

Licensing and encryption controls again, do not apply in authoritarian countries. You are already breaking the law by circumventing the communications blackout.

Internet via sattelite is now a thing

indeed it is. it is not very relevant to our discussion though. it is not a "cell tower" and it needs rather expensive end user hardware. limit of proliferation of such hardware among population during some kind of government internet shutdown will be approaching to zero.

also, as any kind of radio communication, it can be locally jammed, which further reduces its usability in a crisis.

our discussion

Not our. It's a discussion you are trying to have with me about something I labeled as a layman's guess.

I was wondering the same actually:

Wouldn't hard shutting down the internet shut down mobile communications as well. Of course a soft shutdown would allow for filtering that out. I wonder which one Iran chose.

Yes, a cell phone tower is basically a Wi-Fi router for a bunch of people because it has a connection to the internet via a fiber cable and then broadcasts that out over local airway spectrum. The exact same thing as your Wi-Fi does except for longer range and higher power and higher locations.

My Iranian friend was talking to me about the Internet blackouts. I mentioned the ham radio thing.

He told me I would be hung by the regime, but only after being severely tortured for at least a week first.

Not our.

i talk, and you talk. it is our discussion.

It’s a discussion you are trying to have

i am not trying to have, i am having it. here you are, replying to me. why are you trying so hard to prove that a discussion is not a discussion? it does not make sense.

I labeled as a layman’s guess.

yeah. and since i am more knowledgeable than you in this particular regard, i contributed some information you might not have had. now you do and your future layman's guess can be more educated. that is how the discussion works. and for some strange reason, you seem to be pissed about it.