Skip to content

Taco Bell rethinks AI drive-through after man orders 18,000 waters

Technology
216 126 546
  • 8 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    cecilkorik@lemmy.caC
    As someone who lives near a major international border, I also run into this problem, but I'm also fucking confused why this is even a problem. The phone has a fucking GPS built in. It knows exactly where it is at all times. There is no excuse for this except greedy providers and cowardly regulators. If I am standing on my country's soil, using an unmodified cellphone, within a reasonable margin of error, I should pay my country's local rates. Full stop. That should be a legal obligation. If telecom providers want to bake that into their roaming agreements with international and specialty providers like that, so they must accept my calls and bill me accordingly, fine. If they want to make the phone refuse to connect to the roaming tower at all and force it to connect to a lower strength local tower, also fine. If because of technical reasons or interference they really cannot do that so that it would just lose service altogether, maybe a popup saying that my national connection has been lost and asking if I want to start roaming, rather than a text saying "Heads up! You're roaming suddenly and we can charge you whatever we want now!" It's not that fucking hard. Make. It. Make. Sense.
  • 52 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    tal@lemmy.todayT
    If I recall correctly, at least for non-group chats they do use end-to-end encryption. That being said, obviously there are some practical limitations on the impact if you think that WhatsApp would actively try to be malicious, since they're also providing the client software and could hypothetically backdoor that. kagis According to this, they do use end-to-end encryption for group chats too. Maybe I'm recalling some other service or a default setting or something. Some service had non-e2e-encrypted-group messages for at least some period of time.
  • How the Rubin Observatory Will Reinvent Astronomy

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    53 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    M
    Giant twice-reflecting mirror of low-expansion borrosilicate covered in pure silver and a giant digital camera with filters.
  • New Orleans debates real-time facial recognition legislation

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    150 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    139 Aufrufe
    A
    [image: 62e40d75-1358-46a4-a7a5-1f08c6afe4dc.jpeg] Palantir had a contract with New Orleans starting around ~2012 to create their predictive policing tech that scans surveillance cameras for very vague details and still misidentifies people. It's very similar to Lavender, the tech they use to identify members of Hamas and attack with drones. This results in misidentified targets ~10% of the time, according to the IDF (likely it's a much higher misidentification rate than 10%). Palantir picked Louisiana over somewhere like San Francisco bc they knew it would be a lot easier to violate rights and privacy here and get away with it. Whatever they decide in New Orleans on Thursday during this Council meeting that nobody cares about, will likely be the first of its kind on the books legal basis to track civilians in the U.S. and allow the federal government to take control over that ability whenever they want. This could also set a precedent for use in other states. Guess who's running the entire country right now, and just gave high ranking army contracts to Palantir employees for "no reason" while they are also receiving a multimillion dollar federal contract to create an insane database on every American and giant data centers are being built all across the country.
  • 123 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    D
    Clear copyright over reach. News titles or tiny excerpts should not copyrightable - that's just idiotic. If thag stops readers from reading your article then it was never good enough to begin with.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Mudita Kompakt

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    62 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    192 Aufrufe
    anunusualrelic@lemmy.worldA
    There you go then. It's 80 €.
  • 15 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    142 Aufrufe
    S
    Why call it AI? Is it learning and said-modifying? If not then is it not just regular programming but "AI" sounds better for investors?