Is Google about to destroy the web?
Technology
62
Beiträge
37
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
Idk man, really seems like you have a hurt butt, try icing it maybe.
Lots of projecting on your part I think. I hope you find the validation you're looking for. I'm gonna mute this now.
-
Unpopular opinion: The missing business model for websites is killing the web. If there was a platform that would distribute a monthly fee to the websites we visit, the web would be much better.
50% could be allocated through traffic, 50% by choice. I could pay 20€ a month for example. Some would go to lemmy, some to my local newspaper, some to my favorite YouTube channels, authors or bloggers.
If enough people did this, investigative journalism would be funded, product testers wouldn't be reliant on sponsoring and hobbyists could gain serious funding without selling out.
Sounds like you want to nationalise the internet and all its services.
If only we could pay for a worthwhile internet via taxes.
-
mostly shit already. ymmv
Is Google about to destroy the web?
Google says adding more AI to its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: this era of online history is closing.
(www.bbc.com)
I recommend Kagi. It is a search engine with absolutely no tracking or ads, AI slop filter, an in-house index and a cute doggo. It's a paid search engine (which means you pay with money not with data), but you can give it a try with 300 free searches with no strings attached.
-
More time per click is such a useless metric for the end user.
I could spend a lot of time sifting through ads, nag screens and bullshit to find the actual detail I want on a webpage.
-
Where do monopolies get their money?
From the consumers of necessary services that they have wholly captured...?
-
Beep boop butthurt.
Good bot
-
mostly shit already. ymmv
Is Google about to destroy the web?
Google says adding more AI to its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: this era of online history is closing.
(www.bbc.com)
peak internet; https://jpbtlorgy.ytmnd.com/
-
From the consumers of necessary services that they have wholly captured...?
I dont believe they are necessary or failing that are not available elsewhere, and i would call captured, handed to.
-
Sounds like you want to nationalise the internet and all its services.
If only we could pay for a worthwhile internet via taxes.
All it would take would be a platform that handles the payment and supplies a tracking pixel. Websites could join and become part of it. At the moment, every single publisher has their own payment solution. If I want to read one local article from Houston today and one from Tokyo tomorrow, I won't join two payment plans. I want them to be paid automatically, like when I play a song on Spotify or watch a video on YouTube. Just a decent amount of money instead of paying mostly middlemen.
-
Someone posted this the other day: https://goodinternetmagazine.com/building-a-slow-web/
I really liked the idea so I quickly made my personal site and put it on the indie webring. It's a tiny community but it's there.
its neat, but its not the same. old internet was more than a thing. it was an era.
