Skip to content

We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

Technology
496 196 1.9k
  • 186 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    W
    Anti-tank dog
  • FairPhone AMA

    Technology technology
    5
    14 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    alcan@lemmy.worldA
    Ask Me Anything
  • 179 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    N
    Remember curse voice ? I remember
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    192 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • 4 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    W
    I often wonder if yours is an automated account, but did you read the comments?
  • Hacker Tactic: ESD Diodes

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    24 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • the illusion of human thinking

    Technology technology
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    H
    Can we get more than just a picture of an Abstract?
  • My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    13 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    139 Aufrufe
    J
    I did read it, and my comment is exactly referencing the attitude of the author which is "It's good enough, so you should use it". I disagree, and say it's another dumbass shortcut to cash grab on a less than stellar ecosystem and product. It's training wheels for failure.