Skip to content

Microsoft breaks Windows reset and recovery

Technology
91 55 19
  • Wikipedia loses challenge against UK Online Safety Act rules

    Technology technology
    20
    1
    176 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    isveryloud@lemmy.caI
    Depends where in Canada, I never had a complaint about bad food in Montreal, but Winnipeg's grocery stores left me wanting a bit.
  • 655 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    170 Aufrufe
    T
    Half a year...
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 10 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    I
    So, China made their own copycat RoboCup competition?
  • Is Matrix cooked?

    Technology technology
    54
    101 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    534 Aufrufe
    W
    Didn't know it only applied to UWP apps on Windows. That does seem like a pretty big problem then. it is mostly for compatibility reasons. no win32 programs are equipped to handle such granular permissions and sandboxing, they are all made with the assumption that they have access to whatever they need (other than other users' resources and things that require elevation). if Microsoft would have made that limitation to every kind of software, that Windows version would have probably been a failure in popularity because lots of software would have broken. I think S editions of windows is how they tried to go in that direction, with a more drastic way of simply just dropping support for 3rd party win32 programs. I don't still have a Mac readily available to test with but afaik it is any application that uses Apple's packaging format. ok, so if you run linux or windows utils in a compatibility layer, they still have less of a limited access? by which I mean graphical utilities. just tried with firefox, for macos it wanted to give me an .iso file (???) if so, it seems apple is doing roughly the same as microsoft with uwp and the appx format, and linux with flatpak: it's a choice for the user
  • 236 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    971 Aufrufe
    R
    Yeah, but that's a secondary attribute. The new ones are stupid front and center.
  • 2 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    82 Aufrufe
    F
    IMO stuff like that is why a good trainer is important. IMO it's stronger evidence that proper user-centered design should be done and a usable and intuitive UX and set of APIs developed. But because the buyer of this heap of shit is some C-level, there is no incentive to actually make it usable for the unfortunate peons who are forced to interact with it. See also SFDC and every ERP solution in existence.
  • 14 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    D
    "Extra Verification steps" I know how large social media companies operate. This is all about increasing the value of Reddit users to advertisers. The goal is to have a more accurate user database to sell them. Zuckerberg literally brags to corporations about how good their data is on users: https://www.facebook.com/business/ads/performance-marketing Here, Zuckerberg tells corporations that Instagram can easily manipulate users into purchasing shit: https://www.facebook.com/business/instagram/instagram-reels Always be wary of anything available for free. There are some quality exceptions (CBC, VLC, The Guardian, Linux, PBS, Wikipedia, Lemmy, ProPublica) but, by and large, "free" means they don't care about you. You are just a commodity that they sell. Facebook, Google, X, Reddit, Instagram... Their goal is keep people hooked to their smartphone by giving them regular small dopamine hits (likes, upvotes) followed by a small breaks with outrageous content/emotional content. Keep them hooked, gather their data, and sell them ads. The people who know that best are former top executives : https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/business/addictive-technology.html https://www.today.com/parents/teens/facebook-whistleblower-frances-haugen-rcna15256