Skip to content

Microsoft breaks Windows reset and recovery

Technology
91 55 19
  • how to avoid LLM suctioning my data

    Technology technology
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Coding and Gaming on AR Glasses

    Technology technology
    8
    34 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    61 Aufrufe
    shatur@lemmy.mlS
    I think the glasses are quite solid, but I haven’t dropped them yet I never buy additional warranties.
  • 199 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    382 Aufrufe
    I
    I'm not saying Trump wouldn't try to take such a thing, but this doesn't give him any more ability to do so than he had before. Obviously he's willing to be a fascist, so he doesn't need any change in an organization's designation to do something undemocratic toward them. He has exactly as much control as he had before. This doesn't change anything.
  • 119 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    185 Aufrufe
    J
    Windows isn't little-known.
  • 4 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    190 Aufrufe
    W
    I often wonder if yours is an automated account, but did you read the comments?
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • Is Internet Content Too Engaging?

    Technology technology
    3
    4 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    T
    The number of tabs I have open from sites I’ve clicked on, started reading, said “eh, I’ll get back to this later” and never have, says no.
  • 106 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    386 Aufrufe
    tryenjer@lemmy.worldT
    In short, we will need an open-source alternative to these implants, of course.