Skip to content

Operation Narnia: Iran’s nuclear scientists reportedly killed simultaneously using special weapon

Technology
396 178 16.3k
  • 59 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    305 Aufrufe
    P
    Use a different print head, sections of print bed, or just entirely new print beds and you defeat this 'tracing'
  • I was wrong about robots.txt

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    85 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    330 Aufrufe
    E
    Right, but the article does. Anyway, I'm moving on. Thanks for the discussion.
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • Study finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focus

    Technology technology
    55
    359 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    665 Aufrufe
    D
    Based on what data?
  • 254 Stimmen
    143 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    S
    Why would every American buy one if they can't afford insurance + medical bills to pay for health care? "Oh look, I'm having a heart attack. Good to know. Guess I'll just keep working."
  • 28 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    J
    Just keep in mind they are considered a crime in the US and can be located. Use with caution.
  • 15 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    P
    WTF I looked for something like this for a while and this never popped up. Awesome.
  • Is Google about to destroy the web?

    Technology technology
    65
    1
    192 Stimmen
    65 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    Or validating source, making sure it isn't AI content which usually regurgitates the same talking points. Homogenizing the entire query and removing actual information variance of personal experience.