Skip to content

Operation Narnia: Iran’s nuclear scientists reportedly killed simultaneously using special weapon

Technology
376 176 0
  • Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    344 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    The new analysis contradicts the social media platform’s claims that exposure to hate speech and bot-like activity decreased during Elon Musk’s tenure. They might both be right. I know my exposure to hate speech and bot-like activity decreased since I stopped engaging with that platform.
  • 165 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    In the meantime: Parents: don’t give your children lighted rectangles to play with.
  • Gov. Landry signs new drone defense law; first in nation

    Technology technology
    30
    105 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    J
    I'm sure the 2 iq police in Louisiana will be able to figure any of this out. That equipment will be rotting in some storage unit in 3 months.
  • 85K – A Melhor Opção para Quem Busca Diversão e Recompensas

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The largest cryptocurrency money-laundering ring

    Technology technology
    26
    327 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    It has their name and where it came from so. Yes? That's not what I asked. Are you expecting people to direct link everything even when it is already atributed? I mean is that really too much to expect of people? To simply copy the link where they found the information and post it along with where they shared it?
  • 463 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 24 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    toastedravioli@midwest.socialT
    Im all for making the traditional market more efficient and transparent, if blockchain can accommodate that, so long as we can also make crypto more like the traditional market. At least in terms of criminalizing shit that would obviously be illegal to do with securities
  • 12 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    F
    The new Pebble watches look interesting. Relatively basic, but long battery life (they promise) and open-source operating system.