Skip to content

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Guarantee Military Right to Repair Its Equipment

Technology
63 39 315
  • U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

    What about the civilian right to repair.

    Why can’t we all just be allowed to fix all of our shit. Sell me parts, let me open up things and poke around without illegals saying I violated the warranty.

  • This is really going to confuse MAGA. Pro-military but anti-corporate profits…

    <grabs popcorn>…

    your first mistake was thinking anyone associated with maga will think this critically, lol

  • Thanks for the type up! I really do appreciate the info, I'm just bitching about the current state of things and how this seems like a distraction compared to the laundry list of other stuff going on.

    No problem. I'm not happy with the current state of things either, but crossing one thing off the list, even if its lower priority to us, is still good for someone.

    I find it interesting that some of the other comments go on picking apart my thing, that basically boil down to military = bad, so right to repair = bad and its not a problem because they are already wasting money. Be glad something good is moving forward.

    Consumer rights have been increasingly stomped on by the mega corporations for years now, and they continuasly push the boundries. The very concept of a terms of service "contract" that can be changed anytime by 1 party (and heavily in their favor) is insane.
    The more control we get back the better.

  • instead of pushing for a right to repair for all US citizens, including military, they instead opt for right to repair for military only.

    this sends the message that corporate interests are far more valuable to political leaders than the needs of their constituency.

    Warren looks great on paper, but given the opportunity she fails to deliver to the American public what is needed. she's no different than Joe Biden, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, etc. At the end of the day they serve their corporate masters and not the public.

    if they did serve the public this wouldn't even be news because everyone would have had the right to repair decades ago.

    Got it. Since what they did wasn't 100% perfect and a fix to everything, they are tone deaf and terrible politicians. It's a really good thing what they did, but since it doesn't help you personally, then it is a terrible thing. They recognized something that needed fixing that will save billions of taxpayer dollars and hurts large corporations, but since they didn't fix the thing that impacts you then it is bad.

    Also, this is the OPPOSITE of sending the message that corporate interests are more valuable. This is saying that corporations that are making billions off taxpayer funded contracts will no longer be able to bilk us (as much).

    Yes, they should absolutely go after the right to repair for everyone, but maybe (and I'm just spitballing here) Warren knows that she couldn't get the Republican majority to vote yes on a full package and went for the win she could get instead of blocking something that does do good. You do realize, right, that the Democrats do not have a majority anywhere in the federal government?

  • Got it. Since what they did wasn't 100% perfect and a fix to everything, they are tone deaf and terrible politicians. It's a really good thing what they did, but since it doesn't help you personally, then it is a terrible thing. They recognized something that needed fixing that will save billions of taxpayer dollars and hurts large corporations, but since they didn't fix the thing that impacts you then it is bad.

    Also, this is the OPPOSITE of sending the message that corporate interests are more valuable. This is saying that corporations that are making billions off taxpayer funded contracts will no longer be able to bilk us (as much).

    Yes, they should absolutely go after the right to repair for everyone, but maybe (and I'm just spitballing here) Warren knows that she couldn't get the Republican majority to vote yes on a full package and went for the win she could get instead of blocking something that does do good. You do realize, right, that the Democrats do not have a majority anywhere in the federal government?

    maybe instead of trying to work with the fascist ideological cult, previously known as the Republican party, her and her fellow democrats should instead be focused on making it as difficult as possible for the current fascist regime to function?

    maybe if they had a spine to stand up for what is best for the country we might not be facing the realistic threat of concentration camps in America.

    they were elected to serve and protect American interests. tell me, how does working with the "obvious elephant" in the room serve and protect American interests?

  • maybe instead of trying to work with the fascist ideological cult, previously known as the Republican party, her and her fellow democrats should instead be focused on making it as difficult as possible for the current fascist regime to function?

    maybe if they had a spine to stand up for what is best for the country we might not be facing the realistic threat of concentration camps in America.

    they were elected to serve and protect American interests. tell me, how does working with the "obvious elephant" in the room serve and protect American interests?

    OK, what should they have done in this case? Please give concrete steps what they should have done.

    I agree with you they should have been doing a lot more to deny a functioning government for the last 6 months, but in this case the very best they could have done was not co-sponsor the bill and then vote Yes on it. Because, again, this bill is a GOOD THING. It isn't the best thing, but it is a good thing.

  • OK, what should they have done in this case? Please give concrete steps what they should have done.

    I agree with you they should have been doing a lot more to deny a functioning government for the last 6 months, but in this case the very best they could have done was not co-sponsor the bill and then vote Yes on it. Because, again, this bill is a GOOD THING. It isn't the best thing, but it is a good thing.

    you mean the one that's defunding medicare? defunding snap? or is it the one that's going to cost America $3 Trillion? whoops same one.

    so tell me, how is any of this worth the bad things?

  • you mean the one that's defunding medicare? defunding snap? or is it the one that's going to cost America $3 Trillion? whoops same one.

    so tell me, how is any of this worth the bad things?

    None of those things are involved in this bill. Everything you mentioned is all about the reconciliation budget.

    Please say what could have been done on this bill, which is completely separate legislation.

  • None of those things are involved in this bill. Everything you mentioned is all about the reconciliation budget.

    Please say what could have been done on this bill, which is completely separate legislation.

    #read the fucking document

    1000001746
    1000001747
    1000001748
    1000001749
    1000001750
    1000001751
    1000001752
    1000001753
    1000001754
    1000001755
    1000001756
    1000001757

  • #read the fucking document

    1000001746
    1000001747
    1000001748
    1000001749
    1000001750
    1000001751
    1000001752
    1000001753
    1000001754
    1000001755
    1000001756
    1000001757

    Are you insane or just fucking stupid? Serious question here. Not trying to be insulting.

    This entire topic of conversation is about this bill:
    https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warren-sheehy-introduce-bipartisan-bill-to-guarantee-military-right-to-repair-its-equipment

    None of the stuff you posted about or linked about in 80pt font is in the bill everyone else is talking about. The stuff you are ranting about is in the Big Beautiful Bill, which is a different legislative bill that Senator Warren (and every other Democrat) voted against.

  • U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

    how about the military just stop paying for repairs entirely and let the equipment deteriorate and not replace it

  • 14 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    They are not, however, a version of human intelligence. Nor are they truth seekers or reasoning machines. Neither are our brains. “Brains are survival engines, not truth detectors. If self-deception promotes fitness, the brain lies. Stops noticing—irrelevant things. Truth never matters. Only fitness. By now you don’t experience the world as it exists at all. You experience a simulation built from assumptions. Shortcuts. Lies. Whole species is agnosiac by default.” ― Peter Watts, Blindsight LLMs are built from our words. Maybe they're more human than human? One wonders.
  • Bluesky is rolling out age verification in the UK

    Technology technology
    40
    1
    160 Stimmen
    40 Beiträge
    204 Aufrufe
    3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com3
    you know that the new online safety act mandates age verification for pretty much anything don't you?
  • The End Of The Hackintosh Is Upon Us

    Technology technology
    50
    1
    240 Stimmen
    50 Beiträge
    276 Aufrufe
    S
    There are some companies as bad as Apple (John Deere comes to mind), but it's certainly not the norm. User-replacable standard m.2 SSDs are bog standard and non-standard formats are really rare. Apart from Apple I can not think of many companies that do that. IIRC Red Magic cameras, and Synology NAS but that's the only ones I can think of.
  • 965 Stimmen
    101 Beiträge
    395 Aufrufe
    D
    That's always worth considering. A phone app doesn't take a big operating budget to launch and maintain. Especially for state-actors.
  • Cloudflare to AI Crawlers: Pay or be blocked

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    179 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    F
    Make a dummy Google Account, and log into it when on the VPN. Having an ad history avoids the blocks usually. (Note: only do this if your browsing is not activist related/etc) Also, if it's image captchas that never end, switch to the accessibility option for the captcha.
  • 6 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    blue_berry@lemmy.worldB
    Cool. Well, the feedback until now was rather lukewarm. But that's fine, I'm now going more in a P2P-direction. It would be cool to have a way for everybody to participate in the training of big AI models in case HuggingFace enshittifies
  • 229 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    Z
    I'm having a hard time believing the EU cant afford a $5 wrench for decryption
  • 241 Stimmen
    175 Beiträge
    643 Aufrufe
    N
    I think a generic plug would be great but look at how fragmented USB specifications are. Add that to biology and it's a whole other level of difficulty. Brain implants have great potential but the abandonment issue is a problem that exists now that we have to solve for. It's also not really a tech issue but a societal one on affordability and accountability of medical research. Imagine if a company held the patents for the brain device and just closed down without selling or leasing the patent. People with that device would have no support unless a government body forced the release of the patent. This has already happened multiple times to people in clinical trials and scaling up deployment with multiple versions will make the situation worse. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2818077 I don't really have a take on your personal desires. I do think if anyone can afford one they should make sure it's not just the up front cost but also the long term costs to be considered. Like buying an expensive car, it's not if you can afford to purchase it but if you can afford to wreck it.