Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. A 3-tonne, $1.5 billion satellite to watch Earth’s every move is set to launch this week

A 3-tonne, $1.5 billion satellite to watch Earth’s every move is set to launch this week

Technology
54 40 568
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • estebanabaroa@lemmy.worldE

    Selfhosted peer-to-peer reddit alternative built on IPFS

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    30 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    R
    In Freenet you replicate random blocks from over the network. While this thing is like torrents, you replicate what you download. At least that.
  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldR

    Like clockwork, Peacock is raising subscription prices again

    Technology technology
    55
    1
    328 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    963 Aufrufe
    maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM
    And a 24TB drive goes for 350, I don't see prices going up either
  • pro@programming.devP

    Anubis, The Opensource Defender Against AI Bots: I fight bots in my free time

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    346 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    199 Aufrufe
    L
    Great interview! The whole proof-of-work approach is fascinating, and reminds me of a very old email concept he mentions in passing, where an email server would only accept a msg if the sender agreed to pay like a dollar. Then the user would accept the msg, which would refund the dollar. So this would end up costing legitimate senders nothing but would require spammers to front way too much money to make email spamming affordable. In his version the sender must do a processor-intensive computation, which is fine at the volume legitimate senders use but prohibitive for spammers.
  • E

    Open-Source vs Closed AI: What Businesses Must Know

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • tonytins@pawb.socialT

    Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    584 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • dimensionwave@lemm.eeD

    Album 'Hysteria' Out Now

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • A

    Is the U.S. Vulnerable to a Drone Sneak Attack?

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    64 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    342 Aufrufe
    underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU
    Heavy Lift drones can carry upwards of 55 lbs. And there's no reason you're limited to one.
  • deltawingdragon@sh.itjust.worksD

    Chrome using Gemini Nano for ‘Enhanced Protection’ against scams

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.