Skip to content

Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

Technology
41 27 0
  • 779 Stimmen
    393 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    0
    I too find Boeing engineers and other factory workers valid targets for murder. Nice finding a fellow.
  • 495 Stimmen
    153 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    B
    It's not how it works, don't worry. They're just strawmanning.
  • 88 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    gnulinuxdude@lemmy.mlG
    I have never used a food delivery service because they all feel so fucking scummy and exploitative. Seems like they are in equal need as we are for regulatory overhaul of this business practice.
  • 898 Stimmen
    204 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    S
    I know what an LLM is doing. You don't know what your brain is doing.
  • 50 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    G
    Anyone here use XING?
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • Nextcloud cries foul over Google Play Store app rejection

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    6 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 88 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    C
    Won't someone think of the shareholders?!