Skip to content

Forced E-Waste PCs And The Case Of Windows 11’s Trusted Platform

Technology
116 79 1.4k
  • Can I build a fully decentralised website?

    Technology technology
    14
    15 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.comS
    Microsoft Flight Simulator,... duh /s
  • 654 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    222 Aufrufe
    T
    Half a year...
  • Are you worried about your child’s screentime? Get a landline

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    52 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    119 Aufrufe
    fizz@lemmy.nzF
    I can understand why parents woulr be wary giving their kids to much access to technology thats why I'm pushing back and saying that going full Luddite returning to a landline is not the answer.
  • 199 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    397 Aufrufe
    I
    I'm not saying Trump wouldn't try to take such a thing, but this doesn't give him any more ability to do so than he had before. Obviously he's willing to be a fascist, so he doesn't need any change in an organization's designation to do something undemocratic toward them. He has exactly as much control as he had before. This doesn't change anything.
  • How to store data on paper?

    Technology technology
    9
    44 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    108 Aufrufe
    U
    This has to be a shitpost. Transportation of paper-stored data You can take the sheets with you, send them by post, or even attach them to homing pigeons
  • Napster/BitTorrent for machine learning?

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    27 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    G
    What would a use case look like? I assume that the latency will make it impractical to train something that's LLM-sized. But even for something small, wouldn't a data center be more efficient?
  • My character isn't answering me

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.