Skip to content

France Pushes Digital ID Check Laws For Platforms Like Reddit and Bluesky

Technology
12 11 48
  • 109 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    L
    Yeah, I agree. It's a great starting place. Recently I needed a piece of information that I couldn't find anywhere through a regular search. ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini all gave a similar answers, but it was only confirmed when I contacted the company directly which took about 3 business days to reply.
  • 466 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    J
    Paging Ray Bradbury......... https://www.libraryofshortstories.com/storiespdf/the-veldt.pdf
  • Is Matrix cooked?

    Technology technology
    54
    100 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    146 Aufrufe
    W
    Didn't know it only applied to UWP apps on Windows. That does seem like a pretty big problem then. it is mostly for compatibility reasons. no win32 programs are equipped to handle such granular permissions and sandboxing, they are all made with the assumption that they have access to whatever they need (other than other users' resources and things that require elevation). if Microsoft would have made that limitation to every kind of software, that Windows version would have probably been a failure in popularity because lots of software would have broken. I think S editions of windows is how they tried to go in that direction, with a more drastic way of simply just dropping support for 3rd party win32 programs. I don't still have a Mac readily available to test with but afaik it is any application that uses Apple's packaging format. ok, so if you run linux or windows utils in a compatibility layer, they still have less of a limited access? by which I mean graphical utilities. just tried with firefox, for macos it wanted to give me an .iso file (???) if so, it seems apple is doing roughly the same as microsoft with uwp and the appx format, and linux with flatpak: it's a choice for the user
  • 817 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    C
    And then price us out
  • Building a slow web

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    175 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    116 Aufrufe
    I
    Realistically, you don't need security, NAT alone is enough since the packets have nowhere to go without port forwarding. But IF you really want to build front end security here is my plan. ISP bridge -> WAN port of openwrt capable router with DSA supported switch (that is almost all of them) Set all ports of the switch to VLAN mirroring mode bridge WAN and LAN sides Fail2Ban IP block list in the bridge LAN PORT 1 toward -> OpenWRT running inside Proxmox LXC (NAT lives here) -> top of rack switch LAN PORT 2 toward -> Snort IDS LAN PORT 3 toward -> combined honeypot and traffic analyzer Port 2&3 detect malicious internet hosts and add them to the block list (and then multiple other openwrt LXCs running many many VPN ports as alternative gateways, I switch LAN host's internet address by changing their default gateway) I run no internal VLAN, all one LAN because convenience is more important than security in my case.
  • 168 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    A
    Law enforcement officer
  • 168 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    78 Aufrufe
    4
    Found it in my settings, not sure how I’ve missed it. Been a Bitwarden user since the first LastPass hack.
  • European Open Web Index goes public in June 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    13 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet