Skip to content

iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original

Technology
126 71 4.3k
  • 201 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    P
    Hmm, I wonder why they'd do that... I guess we'll never know.
  • AI tech breathes life into virtual companion animals

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    3 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    P
    No it doesn't
  • Tech bosses spend millions more on personal security

    Technology technology
    20
    139 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    6
    Your tax dollars at work.
  • 170 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    J
    All I wanna say is that they don't really care about us. Tons of ppl are reporting that AI has talked them off the ledge at night when everyone is sleeping. The Government wants you to kill yourself or dial their hotline where nobody ever picks up Oh ppl can't afford healthcare and therapy?let them eat cake .
  • Cybercrooks use Raspberry Pi to steal ATM cash

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    183 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    102 Aufrufe
    epicfailguy@lemmy.worldE
    Watch them try to ban raspberry pi now ... like they did with the flipper
  • 815 Stimmen
    199 Beiträge
    5k Aufrufe
    Z
    It's clear you don't really understand the wider context and how historically hard these tasks have been. I've been doing this for a decade and the fact that these foundational models can be pretrained on unrelated things then jump that generalization gap so easily (within reason) is amazing. You just see the end result of corporate uses in the news, but this technology is used in every aspect of science and life in general (source: I do this for many important applications).
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 24 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    S
    Said it the day Broadcom bought them, they're going to squeeze the smaller customers out. This behavior is by design.