Skip to content

iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original

Technology
126 71 3.9k
  • 287 Stimmen
    56 Beiträge
    455 Aufrufe
    T
    well they all did add to the discussion! they gave me something to think about
  • 75 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    160 Aufrufe
    realitista@lemmy.worldR
    But fascist really fails to capture the ethnic cleansing part. We really do need a new group name to discuss the Israelis who commit ethnic cleansing. Someday I hope we will use it to round up these fuckers for their trials in The Hague. I guess we should call them Likuds or just Zionists.
  • 92 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    107 Aufrufe
    _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works_
    No, TurnItIn is garbage.
  • OpenAI wins $200m contract with US military for ‘warfighting’

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    282 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    374 Aufrufe
    gadgetboy@lemmy.mlG
    [image: 8aff8b12-7ed7-4df5-b40d-9d9d14708dbf.gif]
  • Sierpinski triangle programs by 5 AI models

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    15 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    70 Aufrufe
    M
    oh, wow! that's so cool!
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    366 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • The weaponization of Waymo

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    147 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    264 Aufrufe
    F
    Not a warzone. A protest. A protest where over twice as many reporters have been assaulted and/or shot than waymo cars have burned.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet