Skip to content

EU age verification app to ban any Android system not licensed by Google

Technology
98 65 1
  • Google Keeps Making Smartphones Worse

    Technology technology
    202
    1
    765 Stimmen
    202 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ
    In all honesty, I have no idea. I didn't give the stock firmware enough time on my phone to check on anything other than the amount of tracking and the move to the system partition. As for the reason for putting them in this partition, I'm sold on the idea that it's to keep the levels of invasion as high as possible while removing the user's options to get rid of them.
  • Indeed, Glassdoor to cut 1,300 jobs amid AI integration, memo shows

    Technology technology
    13
    118 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    B
    When being asked about the hole in my resume I hope I can save face by saying : "I used AI to replace my employer for the said time because AI is such a revolutionary technology" .
  • New Google AdSense Fill Empty In-Page Ads

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    22 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    S
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • XMPP vs everything else

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    42 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    M
    Conversely, I have seen this opinion expressed a few times. I can’t judge the accuracy but there seem to be more than a few people sharing it.
  • How the US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state

    Technology technology
    66
    1
    483 Stimmen
    66 Beiträge
    244 Aufrufe
    D
    Are these people retarded? Did they forget Edward Snowden?
  • 272 Stimmen
    131 Beiträge
    549 Aufrufe
    eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.comE
    This is good to know. I hadn't read the fine print, because I abandoned Telegram and never looked back. I hope its true and I agree, I also wouldn't think they'd do this and then renege into a possible lawsuit.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.