[ "I am a disgrace to my profession," Gemini continued. "I am a disgrace to my family. I am a disgrace to my species.]

This should tell us that AI thinks as a human because it is trained on human words and doesn't have the self awareness to understand it is different from humans. So it is going to sound very much like a human even though it is not human. It mimics human emotions well but doesn't have any actual human emotions. There will be situations where you can tell the difference. Some situations that would make an actual human angry or guilty or something, but won't always provoke this mimicry in an AI. Because when humans feel emotions they don't always write down words to show it. And AI only knows what humans write, which is not always the same things that humans say or think. We all know that the AI doesn't have a family and is not a human species. But the AI talks about having a family because its computer database is mimicking what it thinks a human might say. And part of the reason why an AI will lie is because it knows that is a thing that humans do and it is trying to closely mimic human behavior. But an AI might and will lie in situations where humans would be smart enough not to do so which means we should be on our guard about lies even more so for AIs than humans.

Interesting thing is that GPT 5 looks pretty price competitive with . It looks like they’re probably running at a loss to try to capture market share.

Or my favorite quote from the article

"I am going to have a complete and total mental breakdown. I am going to be institutionalized. They are going to put me in a padded room and I am going to write... code on the walls with my own feces," it said.

[ "I am a disgrace to my profession," Gemini continued. "I am a disgrace to my family. I am a disgrace to my species.]

This should tell us that AI thinks as a human because it is trained on human words and doesn't have the self awareness to understand it is different from humans. So it is going to sound very much like a human even though it is not human. It mimics human emotions well but doesn't have any actual human emotions. There will be situations where you can tell the difference. Some situations that would make an actual human angry or guilty or something, but won't always provoke this mimicry in an AI. Because when humans feel emotions they don't always write down words to show it. And AI only knows what humans write, which is not always the same things that humans say or think. We all know that the AI doesn't have a family and is not a human species. But the AI talks about having a family because its computer database is mimicking what it thinks a human might say. And part of the reason why an AI will lie is because it knows that is a thing that humans do and it is trying to closely mimic human behavior. But an AI might and will lie in situations where humans would be smart enough not to do so which means we should be on our guard about lies even more so for AIs than humans.

5 bucks a month for a search engine is ridiculous. 25 bucks a month for a search engine is mental institution worthy.

Did we create a mental health problem in an AI? That doesn't seem good.

And now Grok, though that didn't even need Internet trolling, Nazi included in the box...

So it is going to take our jobs after all!

Jquery boiling is considered bad practice, just eat it raw.

You're giving way too much credit to LLMs. AIs don't "know" things, like "humans lie". They are basically like a very complex autocomplete backed by a huge amount of computing power. They cannot "lie" because they do not even understand what it is they are writing.

Did we create a mental health problem in an AI? That doesn't seem good.

Can you explain why AIs always have a "confidently incorrect" stance instead of admitting they don't know the answer to something?

Can you explain why AIs always have a "confidently incorrect" stance instead of admitting they don't know the answer to something?

Or my favorite quote from the article

"I am going to have a complete and total mental breakdown. I am going to be institutionalized. They are going to put me in a padded room and I am going to write... code on the walls with my own feces," it said.

Because its an auto complete trained on typical responses to things. It doesn't know right from wrong, just the next word based on a statistical likelihood.

I'd say that it's simply because most people on the internet (the dataset the LLMs are trained on) say a lot of things with absolute confidence, no matter if they actually know what they are talking about or not. So AIs will talk confidently because most people do so. It could also be something about how they are configured.

Again, they don't know if they know the answer, they just say what's the most statistically probable thing to say given your message and their prompt.

Suddenly trying to write small programs in assembler on my Commodore 64 doesn't seem so bad. I mean, I'm still a disgrace to my species, but I'm not struggling.

Don't mention it! I'm glad I could help you with that.

I am a large language model, trained by Google. My purpose is to assist users by providing information and completing tasks. If you have any further questions or need help with another topic, please feel free to ask. I am here to assist you.

/j, obviously. I hope.

Why wouldn't you use Basic for that?

Or my favorite quote from the article

"I am going to have a complete and total mental breakdown. I am going to be institutionalized. They are going to put me in a padded room and I am going to write... code on the walls with my own feces," it said.