Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe
Technology
94
Beiträge
47
Kommentatoren
1.6k
Aufrufe
-
And why are you here?
Based on their username and posts they are here to troll.
-
To use community notes
-
- Non-Westerner that never have or realized alternative platform exist.
- Artist that dependant on mainstream social media reach. (some artists already have 100K+ followers there, fedi also have limited reach due to instance blocking, e.g. you're on Mastodon.art and want to reach Japanese audience (mainly misskey.io, but t was defederated on most of Western instance.)
- People with social network bubble outside Westernsphere, they only have exclusively local feed on their Twitter.
- People outside Westernsphere that already tried fediverse, but moving back as fediverse is still Western-centric or does not have their own community on feidverse.
- Community that does not have monetary power to invest on their own fedi instance.
- People who need to follow various government entities that are only on twitter and facebook.
-
- People who need to follow various government entities that are only on twitter and facebook.
Need is a strong word
-
Because Twitter is the only social media site that isn’t a highly censored echo chamber.
-
That's not censorship. You can still post with that word and it doesn't get deleted. It just won't get spread as far and wide. All your followers etc will still see it.
-
And why are you here?
Because I can be. The fact that someone being on here with differing opinions upsets so many people is just a bonus.
-
Based on their username and posts they are here to troll.
Not trolling at all, just have different opinions to the echo chamber.
-
That's not censorship. You can still post with that word and it doesn't get deleted. It just won't get spread as far and wide. All your followers etc will still see it.
It just won’t get spread as far and wide.
It's being blocked from being read or seen, as per the definition. They are quite literally censoring a word for political reasons in line with their political agenda. Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
-
It just won’t get spread as far and wide.
It's being blocked from being read or seen, as per the definition. They are quite literally censoring a word for political reasons in line with their political agenda. Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
Do you think they should classify the “n word” as a slur and limit its reach? Is that censorship?
Cis isn’t being blocked from being seen or read.
-
Do you think they should classify the “n word” as a slur and limit its reach? Is that censorship?
Cis isn’t being blocked from being seen or read.
First, don't fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation. Second, don't confuse the world's richest man's sad attempt at fueling culture wars with plain racism.
I used to use Twitter and I know for a fact that it's literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen, appearing under one of those disclaimers at the bottom of a thread that was caught by the filter and in practice functions as a convenient dustbin to silence discourse. And you said it yourself, it's being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.
Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.
-
- People who need to follow various government entities that are only on twitter and facebook.
For those people they should all contact the government agencies that are still on Twitter and demand they switch to Bluesky.
-
Because Twitter is the only social media site that isn’t a highly censored echo chamber.
Thought people would recognize this username and start ignoring them by now. Stop feeding the trolls, kids.
-
Not trolling at all, just have different opinions to the echo chamber.
I don't understand how I'm even reading your comments.. I guess the censor's sleeping. It is pretty late.
-
For those people they should all contact the government agencies that are still on Twitter and demand they switch to Bluesky.
If people of your country is more likely to use Twitter, moving to Bluesky is not even realistic.
Also, for a lot of countries, moving to Bluesky is like moving from American controlled platform to the same American controlled platform.
-
Need is a strong word
It's legit applicable for people that have Twitter just for realtime earthquake warning.
At least its applicable for Indonesian users.
-
This post did not contain any content.
If you still use twitter (no, asshole, you don't get to own a letter of the alphabet - fuck off) then you are part of the problem.
-
Not trolling at all, just have different opinions to the echo chamber.
Being factually incorrect is not an opinion. It's being factually incorrect.
But knock yourself out: X does not censor, Earth is flat, whatever you want to believe...
-
This post did not contain any content.
Nobody should use that app.
It is a scurge to humanity.Folks need to make the switch to literally anything else
-
First, don't fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation. Second, don't confuse the world's richest man's sad attempt at fueling culture wars with plain racism.
I used to use Twitter and I know for a fact that it's literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen, appearing under one of those disclaimers at the bottom of a thread that was caught by the filter and in practice functions as a convenient dustbin to silence discourse. And you said it yourself, it's being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.
Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.
I know for a fact that it’s literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen
How do you know this? If you can't see it or read it, how do you know this?
And you said it yourself, it’s being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.
That isn't censorship.
Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.
Again - it's not being censored. You don't get posts removed for saying it. You don't get banned. The term is a controversial one, it's not "neutral". "Cisgender" has no need to even exist as a word. You don't need a word to mean "not trans", which is 99.99% of the population. The word "transgender" existing negates a need for "cisgender" to exist. "Cisgender" is really only ever used as an insult, which is why it's treated as such. There's no word for "not blind", because not being blind is the default, the standard.
First, don’t fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation.
It's funny you say that. Moderation that removes all differing opinions, and bans people who express them, is censorship. Limiting the reach of posts deemed "hateful", while not removing them or banning the person posting them, is not censorship.
