Skip to content

Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates Meet for the First Time Ever

Technology
225 110 1.0k
  • 24 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    I
    They want to become the new tax collectors. They want to buy our toy democracy
  • 738 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    339 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • Study finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focus

    Technology technology
    55
    359 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    370 Aufrufe
    D
    Based on what data?
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Something I noticed

    Technology technology
    2
    3 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    H
    This would be better suited in some casual ranting community. Or one concerned with tech bros. I think it's completely off topic here.
  • 40 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    N
    That they didn't have enough technicians trained in this to be able to ensure that one was always available during working hours, or at least when it was glaringly obvious that one was going to be needed that day, is . . . both extremely and obviously stupid, and par for the course for a corp whose sole purpose is maximizing profit for the next quarter.
  • time to switch to DeltaChat 😁

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    2 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    engywuck@lemm.eeE
    The point is... (almost) nobody is going to do that. Ask a layman what a SMTP is.
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet