Skip to content

Java at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhouse

Technology
118 68 863
  • 33 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    I
    This has actually been done for quite a long time. Roman historians could look up common words in databases from partial words and get a pretty good guess at the overall inscription from context.
  • 59 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    289 Aufrufe
    P
    Use a different print head, sections of print bed, or just entirely new print beds and you defeat this 'tracing'
  • 238 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    173 Aufrufe
    A
    Unless you are a major corporation... you are not free to take anything.
  • 42 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    91 Aufrufe
    F
    I imagine not, though I haven't looked into it.
  • Trump social media site brought down by Iran hackers

    Technology technology
    174
    1k Stimmen
    174 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    B
    That's the spirit
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    517 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

    Technology technology
    34
    1
    205 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    406 Aufrufe
    M
    Well if they're collating data, not that difficult to add a new table for gun ownership.
  • 374 Stimmen
    69 Beiträge
    802 Aufrufe
    T
    In those situations I usually enable 1.5x.